XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons   
   XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns   
   XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival   
   From: kcrawford981@gmail.invalid   
      
   In article ,   
    BeamMeUpScotty   
     wrote:   
      
   > On 2/27/2015 2:35 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > > In article <7PLHw.6105$Cg3.3037@fx22.iad>,   
   > >  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >   >  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On 2/26/2015 3:19 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >>>   
   > >>> what is "maternity" coverage and how many companies offer it?   
   > >   
   > > what is "maternity" coverage for YOU   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >>   
   > >> Well... what is a maternity ward and why is there maternity care....   
   > >   
   > > because heterosexual marriage is so important   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >>   
   > >> Obviously insurance covers it since it's mandated and the policy has it   
   > >> and the hospitals offer it.  It's what ObamaCare is, it's a mandated   
   > >> minimum coverage. That makes Maternity a tax.   
   > >   
   > > so you would prefer women that can't afford insurance to give birth   
   > > under bridges?   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >>   
   > >>   
   > >> maternity   
   > >>   
   > >> Also found in: Medical, Legal, Financial, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.   
   > >> ma?ter?ni?ty   
   > >>  (m?-tžrŒni?-tē)   
   > >> n. pl. ma·ter·ni·ties   
   > >> 1. The state of being a mother; motherhood.   
   > >> 2. The feelings or characteristics associated with being a mother;   
   > >> motherliness.   
   > >> 3. A maternity ward.   
   > >>   
   > >>> as to having what you want, that's what we call a business opportunity   
   > >>>   
   > >>   
   > >> NO it's called a tax.... where they mandate that you buy what you don't   
   > >> want.   
   > >>   
   > >> And you thought Liberals wanted the GOVERNMENT to stay out of a woman's   
   > >> uterus, yet here they are mandating insurance coverage for a uterus like   
   > >> they do a car....   
   > >>   
   > >> Is owning a woman's uterus really like owning a car?   
   > >   
   > > yes, you know how to craft what looks like an analogy, but comparing   
   > > apples to screwdrivers is like comparing a creationist to Albert Einstein   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >>   
   > >> There is your Liberal *WAR ON WOMEN*   
   > >   
   > > Mandatory ultrasounds   
   > >   
   > > In 2011 and 2012, "War on Women" was used to describe the legislation   
   > > passed by many states requiring that women seeking abortions first   
   > > undergo government-mandated ultrasounds.[53] Some states require that   
   > > women view the image of the fetus and others require that women be   
   > > offered the opportunity to listen to the fetal heartbeat. Since many   
   > > women's pregnancies are not far enough along to get an image via a   
   > > traditional ultrasound, transvaginal ultrasounds, which involve the   
   > > physician inserting a probe into the woman's vagina, may be required,   
   > > but these requirements vary state to state.[54][55] Critics have   
   > > questioned the value of having a medically unnecessary procedure, and   
   > > characterized it as similar to some states' legal definition of   
   > > rape.[56] Writer Megan Carpentier underwent the procedure and indicated   
   > > that although it was not comparable to being raped, the process was   
   > > "uncomfortable to the point of being painful, emotionally triggering...   
   > > and something that no government should force its citizens to undergo to   
   > > make a political point."[57][58] However, in an article critical of the   
   > > assumptions of those on both sides of the issue, sociologist Tracy   
   > > Weitz, who opposes mandatory ultrasound, notes that "the use of trans-   
   > > vaginal ultrasounds is routine among abortion providers."[59]   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > this is the conservative version of the "WAR ON WOMEN"   
   >   
   >   
   > Ultra sound has nothing to do with the uterus, it looks at the baby so   
   > it would be a war on babies.   
      
   and in your world, babies aren't in the uterus?   
      
      
   >   
   > Except it's a Liberal war on babies and the conservatives are trying to   
   > save the babies from the Liberals that hate them and the Liberal doctors   
   > that kill them. That make ultra sounds a war on Liberal ignorance.....   
   > it educates the woman and allows them a short sex education course that   
   > shows them what the result of their sex was.   
      
   but conservatives don't want the gov't telling them what to do, isn't   
   that true?   
      
      
   >   
   > Liberals say they want education for people but they don't want any   
   > education that doesn't indoctrinate people into the Liberal cult.   
      
   yes, we absolutely need more classes in creationism   
      
      
   >   
   >   
   > Liberals tell us they want sex education and mandate it. Then when   
   > Conservatives mandate sex education the Liberals say it's a war on women.   
      
   invasive medical procedures are in no way "sex education"   
      
      
   >   
   > Why is it education when a Liberal mandated it and a war on women when a   
   > conservative does the same thing and mandates women get all the facts   
   > about their sexual activity.  All they see is the facts. The Ultra sound   
   > is the final step in a well rounded sex education from the government.   
   > The fact Liberals hate people getting *ALL* the facts and try to prevent   
   > people from getting a full education on sex is telling of who and what   
   > Liberals really truly are.   
      
      
   then the churches should be required to have classes on evolution...you do   
   want equality, don't you?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)