IRS.FBI.NSA.CIA.EPA.FCC.DHS.ObamaCare.gov   
   XPost: alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons, alt.revisionism   
   XPost: alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy, alt.politics.immigration   
   XPost: alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns, misc.survivalism   
   XPost: soc.culture.usa, alt.survival   
   From: I-WAS-JUST-GANG-PROBED-BY-THE-ObamaRegime-SPY-NETWORK@IRS.   
   BI.NSA.CIA.EPA.FCC.DHS.ObamaCare.gov   
      
   > "Gray"  wrote in message   
   > news:mruufa56eik59oq73f0f96ucl0g74g6vuj@4ax.com...   
   >> On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 03:21:47 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Mon, 09 Mar 2015 20:23:39 -0400, Gray    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Sun, 08 Mar 2015 08:11:55 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude   
   >>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Sun, 08 Mar 2015 11:00:42 -0400, Gray    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 20:06:27 -0500, "Scout"   
   >>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> "Gray"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>> news:jqrlfahf48q9nsm4ujeijig968f8bn2qrk@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>>>> On Sat, 07 Mar 2015 03:38:24 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude   
   >>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 20:28:24 -0700, Snout@smack.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 18:31:59 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude   
   >>>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Worse---is the idea that it was a "founders" fear of our   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> government   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that put the "RKB" in the constitution.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was not   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course it was.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Not.  No such fear prompted the 2nd amendment, you dimwitted fool   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Of course there was.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Then either you've never read it or you suffer from a severe   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> reading   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> comprehension deficit.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Apparently you've never read the part about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> "the right of the people... shall not be infringed."   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> The "right" (2nd amendment) had nothing to do with people   
   >>>>>>>>>> having/owning guns.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Of course it did. That's why it says, "the right of the people."   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Now, I know liberals are dumb. And I know that liberals think   
   >>>>>>>>> that YOU   
   >>>>>>>>> are dumb. So that makes you really, REALLY dumb.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> But even a really REALLY dumb person like yourself must feel   
   >>>>>>>>> awfully   
   >>>>>>>>> stupid saying what you just said.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Again---The "right" to have a fucking gun---was NOT at issue---   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> [chuckle]   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> I know you want to convince yourself of this, Gary. Unfortunately,   
   >>>>>>>>> you're wrong, like you are about most things.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Why were they worried about the right of the people being   
   >>>>>>>>>>> infringed?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> They were not   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> You can't find any "fear" in any recorded papers or writing   
   >>>>>>>>>> prior to   
   >>>>>>>>>> the onset of the Revolutionary war----where citizens "Feared"   
   >>>>>>>>>> the loss   
   >>>>>>>>>> of personal guns.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Of course you can. Are you ALWAYS this stupid, or are you   
   >>>>>>>>> trying to   
   >>>>>>>>> impress some liberal girl?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> He certainly impresses me (although I'm a lesbian "girl") a lot   
   >>>>>>>> more   
   >>>>>>>> than you do, loser.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> So you're a man who likes being screwed in the ass....that   
   >>>>>>> explains why you   
   >>>>>>> are trying to get everyone here to do that to you by being such a   
   >>>>>>> moron.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> No, you idiot. I'm a real female who's a lesbian.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> So then you *ARE* trying to impress some liberal girl.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I nailed it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Funny.   
   >>>   
   >>> Did I make you laugh?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> I appreciated the humor, put it that way.   
   >>   
   >>>> Less piece means more peace. Ban guns now.   
   >>>   
   >>> Ooooh! You changed your sig! So you want to ban guns except for   
   >>> criminals now?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Of course I don't want criminals to have guns, but they won't be able   
   >> to get them if there aren't any.   
      
   Yet you say that approach won't work for sex and abstinence and little   
   tiny human lives dying, you contend it's a ridiculous approach.  Bans   
   have also failed for Heroin which is banned most every where on the   
   planet and some places it's the death penalty and isn't that what you   
   wanted to stop... people dying?   
      
   Looks like banning guns is like banning sex, banning Heroin, and banning   
   death. A gun ban is guaranteed to fail and the people being killed will   
   only be more defenseless.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)