XPost: alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons, alt.revisionism   
   XPost: alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy, alt.politics.immigration   
   XPost: alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns, misc.survivalism   
   XPost: soc.culture.usa, alt.survival   
   From: gunnerasch@gmail.com   
      
   On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:22:25 -0400, BeamMeUpScotty   
      
   wrote:   
      
   >   
   >> "Gray"  wrote in message   
   >> news:mruufa56eik59oq73f0f96ucl0g74g6vuj@4ax.com...   
   >>> On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 03:21:47 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Mon, 09 Mar 2015 20:23:39 -0400, Gray    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Sun, 08 Mar 2015 08:11:55 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude   
   >>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Sun, 08 Mar 2015 11:00:42 -0400, Gray    
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 20:06:27 -0500, "Scout"   
   >>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> "Gray"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>> news:jqrlfahf48q9nsm4ujeijig968f8bn2qrk@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 07 Mar 2015 03:38:24 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude   
   >>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 20:28:24 -0700, Snout@smack.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 18:31:59 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude   
   >>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Worse---is the idea that it was a "founders" fear of our   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that put the "RKB" in the constitution.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was not   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course it was.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Not.  No such fear prompted the 2nd amendment, you dimwitted fool   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Of course there was.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Then either you've never read it or you suffer from a severe   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> reading   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> comprehension deficit.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Apparently you've never read the part about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> "the right of the people... shall not be infringed."   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> The "right" (2nd amendment) had nothing to do with people   
   >>>>>>>>>>> having/owning guns.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Of course it did. That's why it says, "the right of the people."   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Now, I know liberals are dumb. And I know that liberals think   
   >>>>>>>>>> that YOU   
   >>>>>>>>>> are dumb. So that makes you really, REALLY dumb.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> But even a really REALLY dumb person like yourself must feel   
   >>>>>>>>>> awfully   
   >>>>>>>>>> stupid saying what you just said.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Again---The "right" to have a fucking gun---was NOT at issue---   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> [chuckle]   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> I know you want to convince yourself of this, Gary. Unfortunately,   
   >>>>>>>>>> you're wrong, like you are about most things.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Why were they worried about the right of the people being   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> infringed?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> They were not   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> You can't find any "fear" in any recorded papers or writing   
   >>>>>>>>>>> prior to   
   >>>>>>>>>>> the onset of the Revolutionary war----where citizens "Feared"   
   >>>>>>>>>>> the loss   
   >>>>>>>>>>> of personal guns.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Of course you can. Are you ALWAYS this stupid, or are you   
   >>>>>>>>>> trying to   
   >>>>>>>>>> impress some liberal girl?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> He certainly impresses me (although I'm a lesbian "girl") a lot   
   >>>>>>>>> more   
   >>>>>>>>> than you do, loser.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> So you're a man who likes being screwed in the ass....that   
   >>>>>>>> explains why you   
   >>>>>>>> are trying to get everyone here to do that to you by being such a   
   >>>>>>>> moron.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> No, you idiot. I'm a real female who's a lesbian.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> So then you *ARE* trying to impress some liberal girl.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I nailed it.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Funny.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Did I make you laugh?   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> I appreciated the humor, put it that way.   
   >>>   
   >>>>> Less piece means more peace. Ban guns now.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Ooooh! You changed your sig! So you want to ban guns except for   
   >>>> criminals now?   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Of course I don't want criminals to have guns, but they won't be able   
   >>> to get them if there aren't any.   
   >   
   >Yet you say that approach won't work for sex and abstinence and little   
   >tiny human lives dying, you contend it's a ridiculous approach.  Bans   
   >have also failed for Heroin which is banned most every where on the   
   >planet and some places it's the death penalty and isn't that what you   
   >wanted to stop... people dying?   
   >   
   >Looks like banning guns is like banning sex, banning Heroin, and banning   
   >death. A gun ban is guaranteed to fail and the people being killed will   
   >only be more defenseless.   
      
   "Gray" has the logical depth of a coat of cheap chrome plate.  Only   
   microns thick unfortunately.   
      
   Gunner   
      
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
      
   "At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child,   
    miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied,   
    demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless.   
    Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats."   
                    PJ O'Rourke   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)