Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.new-world-order    |    You will own nothing... and be happy    |    25,344 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 24,889 of 25,344    |
|    BeamMeUpScotty to nickname unavailable    |
|    Re: LATimes 04/22/15: 'What's Next On CA    |
|    22 Apr 15 11:00:02    |
      IRS.FBI.NSA.CIA.EPA.FCC.DHS.CDC.DEA.ObamaCare.gov       XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.politics.ca, alt.law-enforcement       XPost: alt.politics.obama, alt.revisionism, alt.atheism       XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime       XPost: alt.politics.guns, misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa       XPost: alt.survival       From: I-WAS-JUST-GANG-PROBED-BY-THE-ObamaRegime-SPY-NETWORK@IRS.       BI.NSA.CIA.EPA.FCC.DHS.CDC.DEA.ObamaCare.gov              On 4/22/2015 10:45 AM, nickname unavailable wrote:       > LATimes 04/22/15: 'What's Next On CALIFORNIA'S Water Rates?"       >       > 04/22/15       >       > "CALIFORNIA'S Constitution describes water as a precious natural resource.       Then what?       >       > It will take some time to fully grasp the consequences of Monday's court       decision rejecting San Juan Capistrano's tiered rate structure for water...       >       > ...another clause of the same complex, voluminous and sometimes crippling       document bars government from charging more for a service than it costs to       provide. That leaves CALIFORNIA with this perverse result: Private agencies       may price water solely to        incentivize conservation, but government, which has conservation of water       engrafted into its operating framework, may not...              Why change it, it means the government of Cal. can't gouge and say it's       for "conservation" when that is actually a tax. So now they have to       actually call it what it is and pass a tax on water to create a       conservation plan that uses cost.... the problem there is that the       Politicians (Liberals) don't want to admit they are raising taxes and       call it what it is *A TAX* and we see that this idea to change the       Constitution is just another Liberal attempt to use the *Gruber*       *Doctrine*              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G790p0LcgbI       The *Gruber Doctrine* is the Liberal plan that it's to their advantage       to have a lack of transparency and then lie about everything.              Liberals don't want to call a tax a tax so they try to disguise it as an       environmental issue and call it *conservation incentives* when all they       are doing is having government illegally tax you by gouging the utility       customers.       --               That's Karma              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca