IRS.FBI.NSA.CIA.EPA.FCC.DHS.CDC.DEA.ObamaCare.gov   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.california, or.politics   
   XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.politics.obama, alt.revisionism   
   XPost: alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy, alt.politics.immigration   
   XPost: alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns, misc.survivalism   
   XPost: soc.culture.usa, alt.survival   
   From: I-WAS-JUST-GANG-PROBED-BY-THE-ObamaRegime-SPY-NETWORK@IRS.   
   BI.NSA.CIA.EPA.FCC.DHS.CDC.DEA.ObamaCare.gov   
      
   On 4/29/2015 9:30 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:   
   > On 4/29/2015 11:13 AM, deep wrote:   
   >> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 08:00:31 -0700, Rudy Canoza   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 4/28/2015 7:07 PM, David Hartung wrote:   
   >>>> On 04/28/2015 09:04 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:   
   >>>>> David Hartung  wrote in   
   >>>>> news:Eo-dnbAGev5WV6LInZ2dnUU7-d2dnZ2d@giganews.com:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 04/28/2015 09:06 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:   
   >>>>>>> David Hartung  wrote in   
   >>>>>>> news:vqWdndN6pNvxxqPInZ2dnUU7-T2dnZ2d@giganews.com:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 04/27/2015 09:06 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> If you don't like gay marriage then don't   
   >>>>>>>>> get gay married. Why is that so difficult for   
   >>>>>>>>> Hartung and company?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Not the issue.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> The problem of same sex marriage has been discussed ad-nauseum in   
   >>>>>>>> this forum, and it is very apparent that we will never agree. The   
   >>>>>>>> subject now is whether or not same sex marriage is a constitutional   
   >>>>>>>> right, and whether or not those of us who have religious objections   
   >>>>>>>> to same sex marriage will be allowed our constitutional right to   
   >>>>>>>> exercise our faith.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>        You have the religious right not get gay   
   >>>>>>> married. What is your religious right to prevent   
   >>>>>>> OTHERS from getting gay married?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> What is your right to use the courts to change the law?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>      You mean like Loving v Virginia?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>      Are you still defending the "state's right"   
   >>>>> to ban interracial marriage?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The last time I checked, this is not about interracial marriage.   
   >>>   
   >>> It is perfectly analogous.   
   >>   
   >> It is, now huh?   So then you support a States' right to make   
   >> interracial "marriages" illegal.   And if mixed races want to marry   
   >> they must call it a "civil union".   
   >   
   > I would say NO, but a Religion can refuse gay or inter racial marriages   
   > and yes they would have to be State or Federal "civil unions" that fit   
   > under the 14th amendment which says the government has to treat all   
   > people equal.   
   >   
   > Nothing says the religious definition of MARRIAGE has to fit the   
   > Governments need for equality... being equal is all the problem for the   
   > government to solve not for the private sector and religion.....   
   >   
   > There is NO amendment that says *the People* can't discriminate.  The   
   > 14th amendment says Government can't discriminate.   
   >   
   >   
      
      
   --   
    That's Karma   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)