IRS.FBI.NSA.CIA.EPA.FCC.DHS.CDC.DEA.AMTRAK.FreddieMac.ObamaCare.gov   
   XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.politics.obama, alt.revisionism   
   XPost: alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy, alt.politics.immigration   
   XPost: alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns, misc.survivalism   
   XPost: soc.culture.usa, alt.survival, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: alt.politics.economics   
   From: I-WAS-JUST-GANG-PROBED-BY-THE-ObamaRegime-SPY-NETWORK@IRS.   
   BI.NSA.CIA.EPA.FCC.DHS.CDC.DEA.AMTRAK.FreddieMac.ObamaCare.gov   
      
   On 6/20/2015 9:15 AM, nickname unavailable wrote:   
   > Lincoln lied to his Yankee constituency and then over 650,000 died.   
   >   
   >   
   > Here is an excert from Abe Lincoln's December 1862 State of the Union.   
   > In it,   he tries to calm the Yankee fear that freeing the slaves   
   > might cause them to move North.   Of course he lies to them by telling   
   > them -- in essense that if they don't want the blacks -- they don't   
   > have to have them.   The first and last paragrph shows his lie.   
   >   
   >   
   >> But it is dreaded that the freed people will swarm forth and cover the   
   >> whole land........ And in any event, can not the North decide   
   >> for itself whether to receive them?...   
   >   
   > (The entire paragraph)   
   >   
   > But it is dreaded that the freed people will swarm forth and cover the   
   > whole land. Are they not already in the land? Will liberation make   
   > them any more numerous?   
      
   HE was saying they wouldn't procreate like rabbits and over whelm the   
   resources of the land.   
      
   > Equally distributed among the whites of the   
   > whole country, and there would be but one colored to seven whites.   
   > Could the one in any way greatly disturb the seven?   
      
   Could they burn Baltimore?  Lincoln was saying NO they can't.   
      
   > There are many   
   > communities now having more than one free colored person to seven   
   > whites and this without any apparent consciousness of evil from it.   
      
   So Lincoln was dismissing the idea that groups of people could cause   
   internal chaos.   
      
   > The District of Columbia and the States of Maryland and Delaware are   
   > all in this condition. The District has more than one free colored to   
   > six whites, and yet in its frequent petitions to Congress I believe it   
   > has never presented the presence of free colored persons as one of its   
   > grievances.   
      
   That would mean that Liberalism's Ideology and Democrats and their Jim   
   Crow (Affirmative Action) laws and welfare has created the problems.   
      
   > But why should emancipation South send the free people   
   > North?   
      
   The North sent General Sherman to burn the South...   
      
   > People of any color seldom run unless there be something to run   
   > from. Heretofore colored people to some extent have fled North from   
   > bondage, and now, perhaps, *from both bondage and destitution* .   
      
   From destitution... created by the North.   
      
   > But if   
   > gradual emancipation and deportation be adopted,   
      
   Obama won't deport the Fence jumpers either.... Obama is NOT like   
   Lincoln who wanted to deport someone.   
      
   > they will have   
   > neither to flee from. Their old masters will give them wages at least   
   > until new laborers can be procured, and the freedmen in turn will   
   > gladly give their labor for the wages till new homes can be found for   
   > them in congenial climes and with people of their own blood and race.   
      
   Deport the ex slaves to Liberia.... The Lincoln solution, rather than   
   war.  Given that the blacks chose to stay in the U.S. rather than be   
   deported.... because the U.S. did create Liberia, what do blacks have to   
   bark about as long as laws are being applied equal to all men.   
      
   It would appear that Obama and his unequal application of the laws is   
   the blacks most serious problems and Obama is taking that practice to a   
   new level.   
      
   > This proposition can be trusted on the mutual interests involved. And   
   > in any event, can not the North decide for itself whether to receive   
   > them?   
      
   The North didn't want blacks and the South enslaved them....   
      
   And today Liberal Government targets them and aborts their human life in   
   the uterus.   
      
   It's as bad as the tales about the Jews.  They were slaves and no one   
   wanted them and eventually Hitler tried to eradicate them....   
      
   It's a very similar story. It doesn't seem like it's a racial story as   
   much as it's one of Liberals and Socialists trying to correct their   
   failed systems.  The Left loves slavery and they even promote a new type   
   today...   
      
   In Egypt it was a King that owned the slaves and worked them for the   
   good of himself and the Kingdom and and then we had the Plantation   
   slavery model where some few people were responsible for using slaves to   
   get the work done and NOW it's *FRACTIONAL SLAVERY* where ObamaCare is a   
   way for us all to be forced to buy in and become owners and slaves in a   
   fractional slave market that forces a slave group to be created and   
   partially owned by some that hide their ownership because it's   
   fractional and they can't be assigned ownership of any one slave.   Just   
   fractions of the entire group of slaves, and that allows plausible   
   deniability to being called a slave owner....   
      
   Liberals and Socialists have always had an affinity towards Slavery so   
   this "NEW and IMPROVED" slavery which is *FRACTIONAL SLAVERY* is no   
   surprise.   
      
      
   --   
    That's Karma   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)