Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.new-world-order    |    You will own nothing... and be happy    |    25,344 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 25,225 of 25,344    |
|    Thomas Heger to All    |
|    Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers?    |
|    23 Jun 18 13:38:25    |
      XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.america-at-war, alt.conspiracy.cabal       From: ttt_heg@web.de              Am 22.06.2018 um 16:17 schrieb Stuart Wright:       > The latest blog post from James Perloff suggests, as others have also       > said, that cloaked missiles, not drones, were used to strike the World       > Trade Center Towers and more.       >              There are MANY different theories about the reason, why the twin towers       fell and what could have possibly struck them.              I personally think, that Judy Wood's theory is correct, more or less.              The mechanism of destruction is actually very unusual. The closest       mechanism is called 'Hutchison effect', invented by the Canadian John       Hutchison.              Hutchison showed, that certain high voltage and high frequency beams       could, if carefully tuned, destroy steel.              The remains of the Twin Towers look a little similar to what Hutchison       produced on small scale.              Another assumption was, that some sort of 'time machine' was used, which       teleported the material into another dimension.              This is at least a little plausible, since from the roughly one million       tons of material the towers were build from only 10 to 20 percent were       found later.              So: where did the towers go? (that was Judy Wood's question).              Another theory tries to utilize 'scalar waves', possibly coming from a       spaceship and/or the Brookhaven National Lab.              There are also theories, the Russian 'woodpecker' signal or HAARP caused       the destruction.              But jets of any kind (or missiles) are imho not among the plausible       solutions to the WTC riddle.              Also explosives (even nukes) were assumed, but were unlikely used. This       would also rule out 'nano thermite' or similar.              TH              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca