home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.new-world-order      You will own nothing... and be happy      25,344 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 25,227 of 25,344   
   KWills Shill #3 to All   
   Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers?   
   25 Jun 18 02:44:18   
   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.america-at-war, alt.conspiracy.cabal   
   From: compuelf@gmail.com   
      
   On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 20:14:59 +0200, Thomas Heger    
   wrote:   
      
   >Am 23.06.2018 um 16:44 schrieb KWills Shill #3:   
   >>> The remains of the Twin Towers look a little similar to what Hutchison   
   >>> produced on small scale.   
   >>>   
   >>> Another assumption was, that some sort of 'time machine' was used, which   
   >>> teleported the material into another dimension.   
   >>>   
   >>       You constantly use your baseless assumptions to support your   
   >> impossible delusions.   
   >>   
   >>> This is at least a little plausible, since from the roughly one million   
   >>> tons of material the towers were build from only 10 to 20 percent were   
   >>> found later.   
   >>>   
   >>       Only the smallest of fractions of material was not found. Less   
   >> than 1% was not accounted for.   
   >>       What was not present was likely that which went over the water.   
   >   
   >   
   >Well, no!   
   >   
      
        Well, yes! This has already been proved, as you know.   
      
   >The towers consisted - like most buildings - from about 10% building   
   >materials, like concrete, steel, glass, aluminum, plaster boards,   
   >carpets and other.   
   >   
      
        And?   
      
   >Since the towers were about 400m high and had about 100 floors, the pile   
   >of rubble had to be a cone of roughly the hight of the tenth floor   
   >(supposed the materials were ground to fine dust and were compacted into   
   >such a pile without any air).   
   >   
   >But the material barely covered the street level.   
   >   
      
        Why LIE about this? It's been PROVED, multiple times, that your   
   claim is nothing but a lie.   
        If you truly NEED to be proved the pathological liar you are,   
   again, I can do so.   
      
   >This is visible in many photos from that day, which were made prior to   
   >the cleanup.   
   >   
      
        It's quite visible that there are several stories of debris, as   
   you already know.   
      
   >Such photos show cars, trucks and ambulances in the rubble. And they   
   >have certainly not flown at the level of the tenth floor.   
      
        The pictures you are referencing were taken days AFTER. And you   
   already KNOW this.   
        I realize you have a very hard time being honest, but do try.   
        I note you dishonestly snipped away most of my post. You often do   
   this rather than face your lying being exposed. It's as if you think   
   being dishonest will somehow erase your dishonesty.   
      
   --   
   Shill #3.   
   Los Angeles Branch.   
   Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp   
   counselor.   
   https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg   
   All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca