XPost: alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy, misc.phone.mobile
XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
From: compuelf@gmail.com
On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:40:42 +1100, Michael Christ
wrote:
>On 20/01/2020 1:17 am, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 10:49:40 +1100, Michael Christ
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 18/01/2020 2:30 pm, nospam wrote:
>>>> In article , Michael Christ
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> Everything gets ramped up with 5g.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> not true.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 5g mmw is low power short range.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're in denial.
>>>>>
>>>>> Trusting in man, no doubt.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, we'll just see what happens when millions and millions of towers
>>>>> go up around us and when masses of more information starts running
>>>>> around and through us, won't you.
>>>>
>>>> cellphones have been around since the 1980s, became very popular in the
>>>> 90s and today just about everyone has one, yet cancer rates have not
>>>> increased at the rate cellphone usage did, plus early on, phones were
>>>> analog and transmit power was a *lot* higher.
>>>
>>>> and then there all the *other* sources of rf, including radio and tv
>>>> transmitters, which are *far* more powerful than anything a cell tower
>>>> could ever possibly put out, by several orders of magnitude.
>>>
>>> No one sits on a radio and TV transmitter 24/7!
>>
>> No one sits on a cellular tower 24/7.
>
>You are a cell tower!
>
Are you pretending to be delusional? If not, please get
professional help.
>And multiply that many fold over with 5g.
>
So I would be *many* cell towers? Really?
>>> There will be millions and millions of these towers all around us in
>>> close proximity! The density of mobile phones in a square meter on a
>>> bus full of people in New York. Think along those lines. Short, medium
>>> to long term effects nothing?
>>
>> Do you have evidence that anything more dangerous than we face
>> now will occur?
>
>Do you have evidence that it is not?
>
Avoidance noted.
It befalls you to prove your claim. I do not have to disprove it.
>It is you that is bringing unnatural into the natural world more and
>more and more and more with no abating.
>
Your delusion that I developed 5G is amusing.
>Anytime that is done that is unnatural means trouble one way or another.
>
>And please, don't insult my intelligence with, 'What?'. I see no
>increase of cancer through man's deeds or something as stupid.
>
You've yet to offer anything that would support, let alone prove,
your delusions to be real.
>>> You are trying to convince yourself 5g is nothing but a harmless
>>> butterfly. It is not natural.
>>
>> Neither are computers. Or the Internet. Odds are, the clear
>> majority of your life is made up of that which is not natural.
>
>Of course, man has changed the whole planet with his ways. It is not an
>argument to compare an orange with an orange.
>
And, over all, man is doing well. There are exceptions, of
course. But those are in the minority.
>>> Nothing to see here folks is bullshit. They are gambling big time with
>>> adult and children's health! This is what you are not getting, in small
>>> doses, arsenic is quite useful.
>>>
>>> You are gambling on the ways of man and look at his record.
>>
>> History shows man has done pretty good, over all. There are some
>> exception. Some of them showing the most deplorable aspects of humans.
>> But, for the most part, man's done well.
>>
>
>Right! That is why we are destroying the planet. Just because we
>haven't reached a tipping point yet, all is well!! :-).
>
>You people with your head in the sand!
>
Provide the valid, verifiable evidence for your claims. If your
claims are based in reality, you will do so. If not, you won't.
--
Shill #2
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
