XPost: alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy, misc.phone.mobile   
   XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone   
   From: compuelf@gmail.com   
      
   On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 07:07:11 +1100, Michael Christ   
    wrote:   
      
   >On 21/01/2020 9:32 pm, KWills Shill #2 wrote:   
   >> On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 08:03:38 +1100, Michael Christ   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 20/01/2020 8:31 pm, KWills Shill #2 wrote:   
   >>>> On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:40:42 +1100, Michael Christ   
   >>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 20/01/2020 1:17 am, KWills Shill #2 wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 10:49:40 +1100, Michael Christ   
   >>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On 18/01/2020 2:30 pm, nospam wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> In article , Michael Christ   
   >>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Everything gets ramped up with 5g.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> not true.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> 5g mmw is low power short range.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> You're in denial.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Trusting in man, no doubt.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Well, we'll just see what happens when millions and millions of   
   towers   
   >>>>>>>>> go up around us and when masses of more information starts running   
   >>>>>>>>> around and through us, won't you.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> cellphones have been around since the 1980s, became very popular in   
   the   
   >>>>>>>> 90s and today just about everyone has one, yet cancer rates have not   
   >>>>>>>> increased at the rate cellphone usage did, plus early on, phones were   
   >>>>>>>> analog and transmit power was a *lot* higher.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> and then there all the *other* sources of rf, including radio and tv   
   >>>>>>>> transmitters, which are *far* more powerful than anything a cell tower   
   >>>>>>>> could ever possibly put out, by several orders of magnitude.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> No one sits on a radio and TV transmitter 24/7!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>         No one sits on a cellular tower 24/7.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You are a cell tower!   
   >>>>   
   >>>>        Are you pretending to be delusional? If not, please get   
   >>>> professional help.   
   >>>   
   >>> It doesn't take that much of a lateral thought to gather that in.  I   
   >>> don't think that was too difficult to understand.   
   >>>   
   >>> On your device in a busy area you are the convergence of many   
   >>> electromagnetic signals and so is everyone else.   
   >>>   
   >>> But if your vested interest is just to make me appear like an idiot to   
   >>> build your case, okay.  That is all too common.   
   >>   
   >>       I don't think I accept and transmit cellular data. But present   
   >> your evidence that I do.   
   >>       I'm waiting...   
   >   
   >Grow up, please.   
   >   
      
        That's funny, coming from you.   
      
   >You a skewing the conversation into nonsense to try and make me out a   
   >fool.  Disingenuous and a weak argument.   
      
        I don't have to try and make you out a fool. You do this   
   yourself.   
      
   >   
   >Information is coming and going on your mobile phone all the time and   
   >when you are in close proximity to many others and heaps of 5g towers   
   >electromagnetic radiation has to increase many many fold.   
   >   
      
        Yes. But this does not make me a tower.   
      
   >Not natural.   
   >   
      
        Most of what we interact with isn't natural.   
      
   >A little arsenic is okay but a lot, that is another kettle of fish.  Can   
   >you extrapolate that, please, or are you going to say that I say 5G   
   >towers are arsenic!  :-).   
   >   
      
        I'll point out how you're attempting to divert from the point of   
   contention.   
      
   >>>>> And multiply that many fold over with 5g.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>        So I would be *many* cell towers? Really?   
   >>>   
   >>> You are being disingenuous yet again, but in a sense, yes.   
   >>   
   >>       Not in any sense.   
   >   
   >You've done it above...again.  Disingenuous.   
      
        Doesn't your holy book claim that lying is a sin?   
      
   >>>>>>> There will be millions and millions of these towers all around us in   
   >>>>>>> close proximity!  The density of mobile phones in a square meter on a   
   >>>>>>> bus full of people in New York.  Think along those lines.  Short,   
   medium   
   >>>>>>> to long term effects nothing?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>         Do you have evidence that anything more dangerous than we face   
   >>>>>> now will occur?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Do you have evidence that it is not?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>        Avoidance noted.   
   >>>   
   >>> You did just that.  I have on my side millions and millions of these   
   >>> very high traffic towers all around us in close proximity and you   
   >>> dismiss it as nothing.   
   >>>   
   >>> If you look there are many well educated people who are heralding a   
   >>> strong warning about this.  Are they all fools, nothing to see here folks?   
   >>   
   >>       You fail to support, let alone prove, the idea that we will face   
   >> any more dangers than we do now.   
   >   
   >I told you, I don't have to prove anything to you.   
      
        If you want to look the fool you are, then you are free to make   
   ludicrous claims and "run away" from supporting them.   
      
   >>>>        It befalls you to prove your claim. I do not have to disprove it.   
   >>>   
   >>> So you claim.   
   >>>   
   >>> It is not about proving, it is about intuition and experience in life,   
   >>> just like it is for you.   
   >>   
   >>       So your making a factual claim was just you being dishonest. Got   
   >> it.   
   >   
   >I don't make a claim unless I believe it to be true.   
   >   
      
        Belief is fine, but reality is better.   
      
   >>>>> It is you that is bringing unnatural into the natural world more and   
   >>>>> more and more and more with no abating.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>        Your delusion that I developed 5G is amusing.   
   >>>   
   >>> Another disingenuous statement.  What do you hope to gain, superiority   
   >>> by dishonestly painting your opponent as a fool?  That is a very weak   
   >>> position.   
   >>   
   >>       I'm not dishonestly painting you as a fool. It is quite honest.   
   >   
   >   
   >Wanker.   
   >   
   >   
   >>   
   >>> Man decided to bring these types of things into our lives, like the   
   >>> pollution from cars, the plastic in the oceans, murdering babies in the   
   >>> womb, all kinds of pollution from our actions, destruction of the   
   >>> environment, animal, insect, atmosphere and so on.   
   >>>   
   >>> But man still marches on hoping there will be no tipping point, 5g   
   >>> (ramped up communication electromagnetic radiation) filling our world   
   >>> with all the more 'unnatural', it is just another thing.   
   >>>   
   >>> Nothing to see here folks is for you, not for me.   
   >>   
   >>       You haven't addressed your claim that I developed 5G. Will you do   
   >> so now, or shall everyone reading accept that you are unable?   
   >   
   >I would have loved your perverted context child games if I was still a   
   >teenager.   
   >   
   >Man developed 5G.  You are man and you love your toys and fuck the   
   >consequences.  It is that simple.   
   >   
      
        Why are you so compelled to lie?   
      
   >>>>> Anytime that is done that is unnatural means trouble one way or another.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> And please, don't insult my intelligence with, 'What?'. I see no   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)