XPost: alt.checkmate, alt.slack, comp.os.linux.advocacy   
   From: wichitajayhawks@msn.com   
      
   vallor wrote:   
   > On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 19:39:33 -0500, "Lane \"Stonehowler\" Waldby"   
   >  wrote in :   
   >   
   >> Doc Hammerslack wrote:   
   >>> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Sat, 26 Jul 2025 17:48:16 +0000,   
   >>> 🌈ðŸ’�🌻🌺🌹🌻ðŸ’�🌷🌺🌈Jen🌈ðŸ’�🌻🌺𠠠
   Œ¹ðŸŒ»ðŸ’�🌷🌺🌈 Dershmendenderer ðŸ’�🌻🌺🌹   
   > 🌻   
   >>> ðŸ’�🌷🌺ðŸ�¶ç¬›ðŸŒˆðŸ’�🌻🌺🌹🌻ðŸ’�🌷🌺🌈 wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 17:48:16 +0000, 🌈ðŸ’�🌻🌺🌹🌻   
   Ÿ’�🌷🌺🌈Jen🌈ðŸ’�🌻🌺🌹   
   > 🌻ðŸ’�   
   >>> 🌷🌺🌈   
   >>> Dershmendenderer ðŸ’�🌻🌺🌹🌻ðŸ’�🌷🌺ðŸ�¶ç¬›ðŸŒˆ   
   Ÿ’�🌻🌺🌹🌻ðŸ’�🌷🌺🌈   
   >>>  wrote in   
   >>> <=3D?U=3D?UTF-8?Q?T?=3DF-8?Q?=3DF0=3D9F=3D8C=3DBA?   
   >>> =3DLnEJYINcdOxiAgo@77.160.253.237=3D?U=3D?UTF-8?Q?T?=3DF-8?Q?   
   >>> =3DF0=3D9F=3D8C=3DBA?=3D>:   
   >>>   
   >>>> I didn't say that you were WRONG, Scott.  I just think that habitually   
   >>>> compiling every fucking kernel release for "shits and gigs" is   
   >>>> pointless.   
   >>>> It's my OPINION.   
   >>>   
   >>> Opinion noted.   
   >>>   
   >>> You apparently think habitually trolling people on Usenet with your   
   >>> broken newsreader for "shits and gigs" isn't "pointless".   
   >>>   
   >>> Seems like it's your hobby.  Do you know of any other people that have   
   >>> hobbies that you consider "pointless"?   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> It's also my opinion that knowing how to recompile a kernel isn't   
   >>>> fucking rocket science.   
   >>>   
   >>> Nobody said it was.  Where did _that_ come from?   
   >>   
   >> You did. Like a typical geek, you said he was   
   >   
   > (they were)   
   >   
   >> wrong without providing a   
   >> correct example.   
   >   
   > Did they deserve one?   
   >   
   > But you're right -- for onlookers, I should have been more   
   > forthright instead of just popping-off at Jen.   
   >   
   >>   All you are doing is sniveling. Linux is HARD and   
   >> you've been saying it for weeks.   
   >   
   > Where?  MID please.   
   >   
   >> If you didn't realize it, that is just   
   >> another example of how unconcerned with appearance nerds are.   
   >   
   > "NERDS!"   
   >   
   > Go ahead, call me "four-eyes" while you're at it.   
   >   
   > Chump.   
   >   
   I wear glasses too.  That's why I need to deride nerds because they hurt   
   my reputation by association.   
   --   
   Hasbro   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)