XPost: alt.slack.goathead, alt.slack, alt.checkmate   
   From: sionf2@drum.cc   
      
   Tom Mix wrote:   
   > In article <>, Doc Hammerslack  wrote:   
   >   
   >> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Sat, 20 Sep 2025 03:01:52 -0500, Kenito   
   >> Benito wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 13:38:08 -0400, mixed nuts   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 9/19/2025 11:49, Janithor wrote:   
   >>>>> On 9/19/2025 2:51 AM, William Stickers wrote:   
   >>>>>> Janithor wrote:   
   >>>>>> [...]   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Who is next?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Not me. I live in a country where people don't shoot each other every   
   >>>>>> day because we don't have a fucking stoopid second amendment.   
   >>>>>> Charlie Kirk said that of the gun deaths, "I think it's worth it. I   
   >>>>>> think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths   
   >>>>>> every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect   
   >>>>>> our other God-given rights."   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> So suck it up.   
   >>>>>> Charlie has.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Whining about it won't bring him back or the other Americans shot by   
   >>>>>> other gun bearing Americans exercising their "God-given rights.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>> You didn't read the link, did you? Kinda helps when you're formulating   
   >>>>> a reply.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>> Not everybody needs (or deserves) free speech.  Free speech is for   
   >>>> important people (like dead Charlie, Donald J. Trump).  It's not for   
   >>>> unimportant people like Jimmy Kimmel or people on MSNBC or CNN.   
   >>>>   
   >>>       What, exactly, do you think the government, or its agent(s), did   
   >>> to Jimmy to violate his First Amendment Right?   
   >>   
   >> The FCC chair threatened ABC affiliates with taking their broadcast   
   >> licenses away for (checks notes) "lying".  That is very much a first   
   >> amendment issue.   
   >   
   > True, the government should not be involved.   
   >   
   >> It's the new "Kimmel rule" in the Glorious Trump   
   >> State version of Calvinball.   
   >   
   > Did you care this much when the same game was played against conservatives?   
   >   
   >> Looks like it's time for another donation to the ACLU:   
   >>   
   >> https://aclu.org   
   >   
   > The same ones who support paedophiles? You're aligning with them?   
   >   
   >   
   >> BTW, another first amendment organization isn't as famous,   
   >> but is important anyway -- and that is "Americans United for   
   >> the Separation of Church and State":   
   >>   
   >> https://au.org   
   >   
   > AU is less about "separation" and more about selective enforcement.   
   > They never raise hell when left-leaning groups drag politics into the   
   > pulpit, but the second a conservative church speaks up, they're on the   
   > attack. That's not protecting the First Amendment, that's weaponizing   
   > it. If they actually cared about neutrality, they'd apply the same   
   > standard across the board — but they don't.   
   >   
   Stand up and raise the flags to the Second Amendment.  Bah First   
   Amendment who needs it.  That's you conservatives.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)