XPost: alt.slack.goathead, alt.slack, alt.checkmate   
   From: Kenito@Benito.naw   
      
   On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:32:50 GMT, Doc Hammerslack   
    wrote:   
      
   >NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Sat, 20 Sep 2025 03:01:52 -0500, Kenito   
   >Benito wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 13:38:08 -0400, mixed nuts   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On 9/19/2025 11:49, Janithor wrote:   
   >>>> On 9/19/2025 2:51 AM, William Stickers wrote:   
   >>>>> Janithor wrote:   
   >>>>> [...]   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> Who is next?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Not me. I live in a country where people don't shoot each other every   
   >>>>> day because we don't have a fucking stoopid second amendment.   
   >>>>> Charlie Kirk said that of the gun deaths, "I think it's worth it. I   
   >>>>> think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths   
   >>>>> every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect   
   >>>>> our other God-given rights."   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> So suck it up.   
   >>>>> Charlie has.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Whining about it won't bring him back or the other Americans shot by   
   >>>>> other gun bearing Americans exercising their "God-given rights.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You didn't read the link, did you? Kinda helps when you're formulating   
   >>>> a reply.   
   >>>   
   >>>Not everybody needs (or deserves) free speech.  Free speech is for   
   >>>important people (like dead Charlie, Donald J. Trump).  It's not for   
   >>>unimportant people like Jimmy Kimmel or people on MSNBC or CNN.   
   >>   
   >>      What, exactly, do you think the government, or its agent(s), did   
   >> to Jimmy to violate his First Amendment Right?   
   >   
   >The FCC chair threatened ABC affiliates with taking their broadcast   
   >licenses away for (checks notes) "lying".  That is very much a first   
   >amendment issue.   
   >   
      
   "This FCC does not have the authority, the ability, or the   
   constitutional right to police content or punish broadcasters for   
   speech the government dislikes. If it were to take the   
   unprecedented step of trying to revoke broadcast licenses, which are   
   held by local stations rather than national networks, it would run   
   headlong into the First Amendment and fail in court on both the facts   
   and the law."   
      -- FCC Commissioner Anna M. Gomez   
      
        Even though your position has failed, if it were true, Jimmy   
   still hasn't experienced any government disciplinary acts.   
      
   >It's the new "Kimmel rule" in the Glorious Trump   
   >State version of Calvinball.   
   >   
      
        Unfortunately for you, it doesn't exist.   
      
   >Looks like it's time for another donation to the ACLU:   
   >   
   >https://aclu.org   
   >   
      
        If you wish to donate, do so.   
      
   >BTW, another first amendment organization isn't as famous,   
   >but is important anyway -- and that is "Americans United for   
   >the Separation of Church and State":   
   >   
   >https://au.org   
      
        Sad they don't support the First uniformly. "Americans United"   
   only support ultra Liberal speech and views.   
        But donate to the organization if it fits your own views.   
      
   --   
   (\\__/)   
   (='.'=)   
   (")_(")   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)