XPost: alt.slack.goathead, alt.slack, alt.checkmate   
   From: Kenito@Benito.naw   
      
   On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 09:19:31 -0500, sion F2  wrote:   
      
   >Kenito Benito wrote:   
   >> On Sun, 21 Sep 2025 09:51:46 -0500, sion F2  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> [...]   
   >>   
   >>> I think a reason for limiting free speech is that the Charlie Kirk issue   
   >>> has been pretty much discussed at the top levels, and it has been found   
   >>> to be another wasteful gun escapade.  It was a close argument with some   
   >>> saying Charlie deserved it but most people saying he shouldn't have been   
   >>> killed for his beliefs.   
   >>   
   >>       Definitely not! Those who disagree with the positions Kirk held   
   >> should debate those who agree.   
   >>   
   >>> I guess Charlie hated trans, but that's not an   
   >>> unusual position.  Trans are basically those guys I don't agree with but   
   >>> I support them having their voices.   
   >>   
   >>       So long as they don't infringe on the rights of others, there   
   >> shouldn't be a problem.   
   >>   
   >They are infringing on the rights of others because a closed mouth   
   >gathers no flies.   
      
        That makes no sense.   
      
   >They gather all the attention, all the pampering, and   
   >all the tax dollar benefits.  And all they have to say is, "Look at me,   
   >I'm really special."   
      
        How does their insecurities infringe on the rights of others?   
      
   --   
   Cogito, ergo spud.   
   I think, therefore I yam.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)