XPost: alt.checkmate, alt.transgendered   
   From: Kenito@Benito.naw   
      
   On Fri, 05 Dec 2025 12:42:21 +0000, Robert Wolfe    
   wrote:   
      
   >On Fri, 05 Dec 2025 01:01:44 -0800, LO AND BEHOLD; Kenito Benito   
   > determined that the following was of great   
   >importance to Kenito Benito  and subsequently   
   >decided to freely share it with us in   
   ><5r75jk1ojpv8k1ptfe0ae655co8ktglmru@4ax.com>:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    Whereas none of them are 1911 revolvers, and no claim has been   
   >>>> presented that they are, it's clear Robert's inability to deal with   
   >>>> reality is getting worse. Add that I've never had them sighted, since   
   >>>> it would be pointless for quick draw competitions, and, well, it's more   
   >>>> PROOF, if any where needed, that Robert's grasp of sanity is weak at   
   >>>> best.      The dullard is free to present his best evidence that I've   
   >>>> ever stated, directly or through implication, I've sighted them.   
   >>>   
   >>> They don't have scopes/optics you stupid blubbering ass.   
   >>   
   >>     Your default admission that you have been caught lying is noted.   
   >>     Hand guns can be sighted. If you were allowed to be in constructive   
   >> possession of a fire arm, you would know this.   
   >   
   >And so you pay to have someone else do that for you because it's too   
   difficult for you?   
   >   
      
        Why would I sight guns used in quick draw competitions? Are you   
   really so uneducated you think the shooter will actually use the fixed   
   sights of the revolver? Yes, you are.   
        You keep mentioning sighting them. Clearly this is something of   
   extreme importance to you.   
      
   >And you feigned that bore sighting a rifle requires firing the gun in a   
   residential home within city limits?   
   >   
      
        It does? This is news to me.   
        I don't know applicable law where you are, but it would be   
   illegal here. I would be surprised if it's legal in your area. But I   
   acknowledged it is technically possible.   
      
   >You sure are an incompetent dingus.   
      
        And yet, you consistently PROVE I am your intellectual superior.   
   With your very low intellect, this isn't saying much.   
        Unless you're merely playing the part of a simpleton on Usenet.   
   If so, you're doing a GREAT job.   
      
   --   
   There once was a girl of society   
   Who behaved with extreme propriety   
   She sat down one day and uncrossed her legs   
   And revealed his secret entirely   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)