XPost: alt.checkmate, alt.transgendered, alt.flame   
   XPost: alt.slack   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article , f00@0f0.00f says...   
   >   
   > Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <697d1864-fa6f-ccd8-b9ed-662c696b1492   
   > > @shinku.aoyagi.konjou>, f00@0f0.00f says...   
   > >>   
   > >> phoenix wrote:   
   > >>> Kenito Benito wrote:   
   > >>>> On Sun, 14 Dec 2025 05:44:10 -0600, phoenix    
   > >>>> wrote:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>> Kenito Benito wrote:   
   > >>>>>> On Sat, 13 Dec 2025 06:31:29 -0700, %    
   > >>>>>> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> [...]   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>          It's been ages since I saw the pictures of Robert,   
   > >>>>>>>>> but I recall   
   > >>>>>>>>> his being very thin. Has someone made more recent pictures   
   > >>>>>>>>> available   
   > >>>>>>>>> that show him to be fat?   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> % calls everyone a liar, not because he thinks they are but   
   > >>>>>>>> because   
   > >>>>>>>> calling people liars is rude and riles them.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Since you seem to have trouble connecting A and B, % calls   
   > >>>>>>>> Robert fat   
   > >>>>>>>> because it is rude and riles him.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> the rantings from the nut house   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>         An odd way to describe your posts. While rare, some of   
   > >>>>>> what you   
   > >>>>>> post is entertaining.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> That's because it's not directed at you.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>        I don't suggest it was/is.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>> It is caustic, immature, and   
   > >>>>> needs correction.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>        Then correct him. Expressing your lacking education in a   
   > >>>> reply to   
   > >>>> me doesn't help you.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>> Those who think they know everything annoy those of us who do.   
   > >>>   
   > >>   
   > >> i am not annoyed though.. i know most things to a high degree of   
   > >> accuracy.   
   > >   
   > > then why can't we achieve absolute zero?   
   > >   
   >   
   > we have gotten very close to -273, but there are random vacuum   
   > fluctuations which cannot be dampened.   
      
   Nothing cold enough to stop molecular motion therefore no   
   way to reach that. If there can't be anything colder than   
   absolute zero then there will always be motion.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)