home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.usenet.kooks      Fans of Usenet trolls, kooks, fuckwits      8,126 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 7,467 of 8,126   
   Skeeter to All   
   Re: Snowflake   
   15 Dec 25 19:02:50   
   
   XPost: alt.checkmate, alt.transgendered, alt.flame   
   XPost: alt.slack   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <1G20R.474714$IGp2.192376@fx13.iad>,   
   dochammerslack@creon.earth says...   
   >   
   > At Mon, 15 Dec 2025 16:20:44 -0700, Skeeter  wrote:   
   >   
   > > In article  > 2ac74191cfea@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>, f00@0f0.00f says...   
   > > >   
   > > > Skeeter wrote:   
   > > > > In article <697d1864-fa6f-ccd8-b9ed-662c696b1492   
   > > > > @shinku.aoyagi.konjou>, f00@0f0.00f says...   
   > > > >>   
   > > > >> phoenix wrote:   
   > > > >>> Kenito Benito wrote:   
   > > > >>>> On Sun, 14 Dec 2025 05:44:10 -0600, phoenix    
   > > > >>>> wrote:   
   > > > >>>>   
   > > > >>>>> Kenito Benito wrote:   
   > > > >>>>>> On Sat, 13 Dec 2025 06:31:29 -0700, %    
   > > > >>>>>> wrote:   
   > > > >>>>>>   
   > > > >>>>>> [...]   
   > > > >>>>>>   
   > > > >>>>>>>>>          It's been ages since I saw the pictures of Robert,   
   > > > >>>>>>>>> but I recall   
   > > > >>>>>>>>> his being very thin. Has someone made more recent pictures   
   > > > >>>>>>>>> available   
   > > > >>>>>>>>> that show him to be fat?   
   > > > >>>>>>>>>   
   > > > >>>>>>>> % calls everyone a liar, not because he thinks they are but   
   > > > >>>>>>>> because   
   > > > >>>>>>>> calling people liars is rude and riles them.   
   > > > >>>>>>>>   
   > > > >>>>>>>> Since you seem to have trouble connecting A and B, % calls   
   > > > >>>>>>>> Robert fat   
   > > > >>>>>>>> because it is rude and riles him.   
   > > > >>>>>>>>   
   > > > >>>>>>> the rantings from the nut house   
   > > > >>>>>>   
   > > > >>>>>>         An odd way to describe your posts. While rare, some of   
   > > > >>>>>> what you   
   > > > >>>>>> post is entertaining.   
   > > > >>>>>>   
   > > > >>>>>   
   > > > >>>>> That's because it's not directed at you.   
   > > > >>>>   
   > > > >>>>        I don't suggest it was/is.   
   > > > >>>>   
   > > > >>>>> It is caustic, immature, and   
   > > > >>>>> needs correction.   
   > > > >>>>   
   > > > >>>>        Then correct him. Expressing your lacking education in a   
   > > > >>>> reply to   
   > > > >>>> me doesn't help you.   
   > > > >>>>   
   > > > >>> Those who think they know everything annoy those of us who do.   
   > > > >>>   
   > > > >>   
   > > > >> i am not annoyed though.. i know most things to a high degree of   
   > > > >> accuracy.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > then why can't we achieve absolute zero?   
   > > > >   
   > > >   
   > > > we have gotten very close to -273, but there are random vacuum   
   > > > fluctuations which cannot be dampened.   
   > >   
   > > Nothing cold enough to stop molecular motion therefore no   
   > > way to reach that. If there can't be anything colder than   
   > > absolute zero then there will always be motion.   
   >   
   > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_temperature   
      
   Yea that too.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca