XPost: alt.checkmate, alt.transgendered, alt.flame   
   XPost: alt.slack   
   From: f00@0f0.00f   
      
   Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article  2ac74191cfea@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>, f00@0f0.00f says...   
   >>   
   >> Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <697d1864-fa6f-ccd8-b9ed-662c696b1492   
   >>> @shinku.aoyagi.konjou>, f00@0f0.00f says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> phoenix wrote:   
   >>>>> Kenito Benito wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Sun, 14 Dec 2025 05:44:10 -0600, phoenix    
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Kenito Benito wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Dec 2025 06:31:29 -0700, %    
   >>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> [...]   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>           It's been ages since I saw the pictures of Robert,   
   >>>>>>>>>>> but I recall   
   >>>>>>>>>>> his being very thin. Has someone made more recent pictures   
   >>>>>>>>>>> available   
   >>>>>>>>>>> that show him to be fat?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> % calls everyone a liar, not because he thinks they are but   
   >>>>>>>>>> because   
   >>>>>>>>>> calling people liars is rude and riles them.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Since you seem to have trouble connecting A and B, % calls   
   >>>>>>>>>> Robert fat   
   >>>>>>>>>> because it is rude and riles him.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> the rantings from the nut house   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>          An odd way to describe your posts. While rare, some of   
   >>>>>>>> what you   
   >>>>>>>> post is entertaining.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> That's because it's not directed at you.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>         I don't suggest it was/is.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> It is caustic, immature, and   
   >>>>>>> needs correction.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>         Then correct him. Expressing your lacking education in a   
   >>>>>> reply to   
   >>>>>> me doesn't help you.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> Those who think they know everything annoy those of us who do.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> i am not annoyed though.. i know most things to a high degree of   
   >>>> accuracy.   
   >>>   
   >>> then why can't we achieve absolute zero?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> we have gotten very close to -273, but there are random vacuum   
   >> fluctuations which cannot be dampened.   
   >   
   > Nothing cold enough to stop molecular motion therefore no   
   > way to reach that. If there can't be anything colder than   
   > absolute zero then there will always be motion.   
   >   
      
   the universe is restless.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)