XPost: alt.checkmate, alt.transgendered, alt.flame   
   XPost: alt.slack   
   From: Kenito@Benito.Het   
      
   On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 12:09:46 -0600, phoenix    
   wrote:   
      
   >Kenito Benito wrote:   
   >> On Tue, 27 Jan 2026 16:40:55 -0700, Skeeter  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> [...]   
   >>   
   >>>> He didn't have it after they took it from him.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Having a gun taken from you isn't a reason for being mag dumped on while   
   you are being shoved face down onto the ground by upwards of 4 people.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Are you vision impaired... or just mentally?   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> You weren't there so STFU.   
   >>   
   >>       This is one of the few instances where Robert is correct. Alex's   
   >> gun had been taken by another boarder patrol agent. This means Alex   
   >> wasn't armed, so a claim of self defense due to imminent danger is   
   >> going to fail.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >But shooting him saved the agent his life and got him some adrenaline   
   >flowing too! You can't tell us it's wrong to shoot people just in case   
   >they have a hidden weapon.   
      
        So everyone should be killed since anyone could have a hidden   
   weapon.   
        Do I have your position correct?   
      
   --   
   When you breath, you inspire.   
   When you do not breath, you expire.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)