Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.dcom.vpn    |    VPN protocols, clients, awesomeness    |    2,349 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,083 of 2,349    |
|    Dave to All    |
|    Re: VPN Solution for Small Business    |
|    28 Jun 04 16:09:46    |
      From: somewhere@overtherainbow.com              Kevin:              Okay. Now what kind of budget? What type of uptime/reliability do you       need? If you want don't foresee going past 10 tunnels, then I would       suggest the Zywall 10W. Solid performance and good reliability for       10 tunnels or less. Command-line interface and dialup failover are       nice features for the price. When you say Samba, do you mean Samba       literally, or Microsoft SMB? Both, of course, rely on lots of       broadcast traffic, contributing to overhead, unless you use DNS/WINS       in a Windows environment. What will you be using for name resolution?              You might also look at Netscreen, though IMHO, you'd be getting less       in terms of features for the money.              Dave                     On 27 Jun 2004 22:16:26 -0700, kaveman743@hotmail.com (Kevin Mader)       wrote:              >Sorry, I wasnt sure how much information it would take. The connection       >is quite fast T3, I think. Always on, and for the most part static ip,       >there may be some instances when the ip of the network would change,       >but those are few and far between. Simultaneous VPN connections,       >probably 3-5, I would imagine. It would be nice to have the option for       >more, cost is a major issue so upgradeability is not mandatory. The       >web server is used for payroll and hours logs. It is almost entirely       >database lookups and would not be easy to port to a sql-like solution,       >(the database has 50+ templates coded in CDML and it would be quite       >time consuming to convert them to PHP or ASP) The main use of the VPN       >would be for Samba access to the computers inside the network, and       >samba access to from the computers inside the network to the VPN'd       >machine. I hope I havent confused anything. Thank you       >       >Dave |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca