Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.dcom.vpn    |    VPN protocols, clients, awesomeness    |    2,348 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,174 of 2,348    |
|    Mike Drechsler - SPAM PROTECTED EMA to Jeremy    |
|    Re: Choosing the right VPN Appliance    |
|    02 Sep 04 23:12:14    |
      From: mike-newsgroup@-DELETETHISPART-.upcraft.com              Jeremy wrote:              > Greetings!       >       > Hi everyone Im new to this news group and I need some help selecting a       > VPN Appliance.       >       > My office network has two broadband connections (DSL and a fixed       > wireless connection.) The goal of the VPN is two-fold, 1. to allow       > employees access to the network from home. 2. to allow our off site       > warehouse computers to connect to our network. Over the next year we       > are planning to expand our company and need a solution that can grow       > with the company.       >       > I have done some homework and narrowed my choices down to the Symantec       > 200R or the Linksys RV082. I have read some old reviews on both units       > and I am interested to see how they compare, and if I should look at a       > different unit altogether.       >       > Any help would be greatly appreciated.       >       > Thanks,       >       > Jeremy              I hear many complaints relating to Symantec devices and Symantec's       support of those devices. I would leave that one out.       With low end devices you need to be careful to pick something with a       high enough throughput rate. That linksys device has an encrypted       maximum throughput of 14Mbps. If your fixed wireless link is faster       than this you should pick something faster. Unfortunately faster means       more expensive because you are moving away from embedded processors to       faster desktop pc class of processors in the VPN equipment. A good       example of this is the Nortel Contivity 1010. It contains an Intel       Celeron 300A class processor or faster with a complete PC compatible       motherboard, memory, etc. It uses a flash memory card instead of a hard       drive but is basically an integrated PC.              I personally like to use the Netopia 3386-ENT as my low end device. It       supports IPSec and PPTP protocols which means you can easily setup a VPN       that allows the microsoft built in PPTP client for remote clients. It       is not a simple device to setup since everything is through a telnet       interface but it has much more power than most devices of this price       range.              I have not personally used that Linksys device you mentioned. I       wouldn't mind hearing from anyone who has used it to see what they think.              I usually recommend the Nortel Contivity line for higher end VPN needs       but it is optimized as a VPN only device, firewall features of the basic       unit is good but nothing spectacular since it is NAT based. Watchguard       also makes a nice unit that integrates strong firewall functions with       VPN support. The watchguard firebox X device has many built in       application level proxies to help you setup more complex security       policies. (IE: Strip specific mail headers from leaving your internal       SMTP servers)              --       WARNING! Email address has been altered for spam resistance.       Please remove the -deletethispart-. section before replying directly.       Mike Drechsler (mike-newsgroup@-deletethispart-.upcraft.com)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca