Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.dcom.vpn    |    VPN protocols, clients, awesomeness    |    2,349 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,849 of 2,349    |
|    Jester to All    |
|    VPN: Router-to-Router or Client-to-Route    |
|    30 Nov 05 12:04:39    |
      From: guerra440@gbronline.com              Hi all,               Want to set up a VPN between a small peer-to-peer lan and two other home       users. Two sites are on DSL, third is FiOS... all have dynamic IPs. I'm       quite familiar with D-Link products, so I'll be using these models for       reference, but feel free to suggest other options (but tell me why       please)... here are my brainstorming results...              1- Three inexpensive DI-804HVs... One at each site... using best security       available between them.              PROS (As I perceive them):       - Possibly better security than using XP client??       - If any site expands, can just plug in additional PCs to to local lans and       not bother with additional connections on PC. Not a big deal, but hey.        - Dial-up access to each site through modem plugged into DB9 port on       DI-804HV (Don't need it right now, but easily might in future)              CONS:       - "Always on" VPN between sites. Greater possibility of attack??              2- One inexpensive DI-804HV at main site... XP client at each remote PC.       PROS:       - Least expensive option.       - When remote PCs are off, there's no tunnel active. Although I realize the       router would be willing to "accept" a potential connection. So I don;t knwo       if my "always on" fear is valid.        - Dial-up access to main site through DB9 port.       CONS:       - Limits me to PPTP.       - Any other security/performance concerns I might be missing.              3- One DFL-200 at main site, NETDEFEND client or DI_804HVs at remotes.       PROS:        - Faster VPN performance (supposedly) I know the "A" in ADSL will affect       speed more than anything.        - Can use NETDEFEND client at remote sites for more robust security.        - Can manage bandwidth to each tunnel.        - Can also use XP client in a pinch.        - Also has DB9 port       CONS:        - A bit more money than I planned.                     So basically, my main question is: What are the advantages/disadvantages       of router-to-router vs. client-to-router setups??       Which of the above is best for simple file-sharing between sites? Each site       has net access, each site has printers. We just need some very simple       50-100k files accessed every now and then, and at worst, a 1-2mb PDF might       have to be opened on occasion.              Thanks in advance!              Jester              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca