From: n4hhe@yahoo.com   
      
   In article <1158677221.622305.114830@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,   
    "amattina"  wrote:   
      
   > SSH: I already suggested this, they want to have the machines on a   
   > Windows domain so we can do corporate antivirus and easy management.   
      
   That makes no sense.   
      
   You plan on using telnet to reach a machine of some sort which runs a   
   telnet daemon to listen for such connections. Any such machine capable   
   of running a telnet daemon is equally capable of running a ssh daemon.   
      
   As for the client end of things, thats even easier. Every Unix worth its   
   electrons ships with ssh, even stock MacOS X. Several choices for   
   Windows as well, I suggest PuTTY.   
      
   Ssh literally is telnet with a built-in VPN. It can tunnel more than the   
   keyboard/telnet session, but not as easily as a full VPN.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)