Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.dcom.vpn    |    VPN protocols, clients, awesomeness    |    2,348 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,070 of 2,348    |
|    Heruan to Joe Beasley    |
|    Re: OpenSWAN vs. iptables    |
|    09 Nov 06 11:35:30    |
      From: heruan83@hotmail.com              Joe Beasley wrote:       > You should not need the virtual interfaces....       >       > Just use the source/destination.              Ok, thank you!       I added to my rules:       iptables -A INPUT -p esp -i eth1 -j ACCEPT       iptables -A OUTPUT -p esp -o eth1 -j ACCEPT       iptables -A INPUT -p udp -i eth1 --dport 500 -j ACCEPT       iptables -A INPUT -s 192.168.0.0/24 -j ACCEPT       iptables -A FORWARD -s 192.168.0.0/24 -j ACCEPT              to establish the tunnel and permit communication from the subnet       192.168.0.0/24 but I still cannot ping or telnet to any services.              It is not less secure using source/destination instead virtual       interface? From virtual interface I know that those packets are coming       from the other end of the tunnel, accepting traffic from a subnet source       I feel a little less secure... isn't it?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca