Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.dcom.vpn    |    VPN protocols, clients, awesomeness    |    2,349 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,183 of 2,349    |
|    Paul D.Smith to All    |
|    Re: Correct response to Aggressive Node     |
|    19 Sep 07 08:34:21    |
      From: paul_d_smith@x-hotmail.com              ...snip...       >> I hadn't appreciated that the initial offer could contain both.       >       > Sorry, I got them the wrong way around (that's what I get for posting       > early in the morning): as noted above it is the responder that can be       > configured with both aggressive and main mode. The initiator can only       > offer one, at least within a single negotiation. In theory the       > initiator can offer both in the sense that it can try one (say       > aggressive) and if it doesn't negotiate within some configurable limit       > try the other. However, I'm not aware of such a client.              Stephen, thanks for clarifying. The background to this is that the Cisco       VPN Client with shared key tries Aggressive Mode but my Netgear DG834G only       supports Main Mode. Unfortunately the Netgear doesn't like the Cisco offer       and the Cisco doesn't like the Netgear response (to the extend that it drops       it, according to the logs) and keeps retrying the Aggresssive Offer.              My "cunning plan" is to investigate whether there is a suitable response to       the Aggressive Mode offer that will make the Cisco client then try Main       Mode. This is a vanity project and as much for my education as anything       else.              Thanks again, your answer should be very useful.       Paul DS.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca