home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.dcom.vpn      VPN protocols, clients, awesomeness      2,349 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,301 of 2,349   
   Rob to karthikbalaguru   
   Re: Encapsulation in VPN   
   20 Dec 09 09:54:03   
   
   25b066b7   
   XPost: comp.dcom.sys.cisco, comp.os.linux.networking, microsoft.   
   ublic.windows.server.networking   
   From: nomail@example.com   
      
   karthikbalaguru  wrote:   
   > On Dec 19, 10:22 pm, "Bob Lin \(MS-MVP\)"    
   > wrote:   
   >> IPSec and PPTP are more popular. The PPTP is using for client to server.   
   >> IPSec can be used as cleint to server or site to site VPN. This search   
   >> result may help.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Thx for your response. But it seems that PPTP can support only one   
   > tunnel at a   
   > time for each user. Therefore, its proposed successor, L2TP (a hybrid   
   > of PPTP   
   > and another protocol, L2F ) can support multiple, simultaneous tunnels   
   > for   
   > each user.   
   >   
   > So, shouldn't L2TP be popular ?   
      
   I think you should know that "what is popular" is not determined by   
   what can do most, what is technically superior and other such reasons   
   that you run in to when you do a comparison of VPN technologies as   
   a technician.   
      
   What is popular is determined by what sells best, or what is part of   
   something that already sells best.  When it can do the job, it is used.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca