Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.dcom.vpn    |    VPN protocols, clients, awesomeness    |    2,348 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,304 of 2,348    |
|    Stefan Monnier to All    |
|    Re: Encapsulation in VPN    |
|    02 Jan 10 15:46:07    |
      ca4ff1e2       XPost: comp.dcom.sys.cisco, comp.os.linux.networking, microsoft.       ublic.windows.server.networking       From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca              > IPSEC is very widely used for infrastructure VPNs and is not       > proprietary. Cisco interoperates with Checkpoint interoperates with       > Draytek interoperates with OpenVPN ....... Never found a problem in       > dozens of cases.              In which sense do they "interoperate"?              > OpenVPN is proprietary and will not work with a Draytek router.              In which sense is OpenVPN proprietary?              > If you do not, setting up and maintaining this simply to support a few       > dialup VPN clients is a big ask. Making a few changes to your firewall for       > GRE is pretty minor by comparison.              I went to the trouble of setting up a personal OpenVPN server (and       corresponding clients) specifically because of the endless problems       I had with firewalls when using PPTP (and I don't know about other       people, but I can't make any change to most of the firewalls to which       I'm exposed; and even when I could I still had problems when several       machines within the same NAT subnet tried to use the same VPN).                      Stefan              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca