From: johnball1@comcast.net   
      
   Thanks for the help.   
      
   "icc"  wrote in message   
   news:e-GdnczoOoviz2-iRVn-sA@speedfactory.net...   
   > You would deal better with dial up than SAT even if you were using TS to   
   be   
   > honest.   
   > "dialup now at 24K"  sounds like there's a bridge tap somewhere on your   
   > line.  If you can   
   > catch a line tech roaming around your neiborhood grab him and ask him if   
   he   
   > would be willing to   
   > take a look and see there was anything he could do.  Back in the day when   
   I   
   > was in the same   
   > position I did exactly that and ended up with some nice speed increase.   
   >   
   > ICC   
   > "John Ball"  wrote in message   
   > news:M4qIb.706113$Fm2.608885@attbi_s04...   
   > > I would be an enduser. Terminal server is really the priority. I am   
   using   
   > > dialup now at 24K.   
   > >   
   > > "Ariel Taranto"  wrote in message   
   > > news:6dddfe50.0312301155.2a8de9e6@posting.google.com...   
   > > > Satellite encrypts all the TCP header info. Because of satellite   
   > > > latency and the amount of time it takes for the ACKs to respond to the   
   > > > SYN requests, vpn performance is poor.   
   > > > The packet has to traverse the satellite link then get unencrypted.   
   > > >   
   > > > Are you just an end user or you work in a teleport, which is your   
   > > > equipment ?   
   > > >   
   > > > Ariel Taranto, Tijuana - Mexico.   
   > > >   
   > > > "John Ball"  wrote in message   
   > > news:...   
   > > > > Has anyone had any success using either vpn or terminal server over   
   a   
   > > > > satellite connection? I've heard a lot of issues with latency.   
   > >   
   > >   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)