Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.dcom.vpn    |    VPN protocols, clients, awesomeness    |    2,348 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 837 of 2,348    |
|    Martin Bodenstedt to John F Kappler    |
|    Re: VPN Performance    |
|    24 Feb 04 19:51:55    |
      From: martin.bodenstedt@gmx.de              John F Kappler wrote:              > I've finally managed to get VPN working for our remote notebook users.       >       > They are now dialing-in to an ISP, making their VPN connection and       > then trying to open an Access database on our file server. Great.       > However......       >       > Performance is very slow, so my question is, what is likely to be the       > worst bottleneck? Is it the dial-up connection, coming in at 30k? Or       > the broadband link to the office which is a standard 500? Or is it the       > way that Access handles the database files?              Hmmm,              if one end uses a 30k dialin connection and the other end a "standard       500" then that end certainly is not the bottleneck.              What you have to bear in mind is that VPN adds a little overhead to your       IP traffic (the tunnel envelope) so You might want to reduce MTU size a       little on the client side (to reduce packet fragmentation).              What happens if you open the access database (using the same       application) when on the local LAN?                     --       Martin Bodenstedt              www.maboko.de / www.die-bodenstedts.de              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca