f173e187   
   From: matrix29@charter.net   
      
   "Kyronea"  wrote in message   
   news:d5b94597-3363-416b-aa43-8b9757d91ce6@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...   
   > Overall, I'd have to say Joel, generally because Joel's host segments   
   > were better, made more sense, and Joel himself was just a nicer guy.   
   > There was also something nicer and a bit more intellectual about   
   > Joel's humor. I don't know if this was because it was Joel himself   
   > doing it, or simply because he was no longer writing once he left the   
   > show(Mike had been there practically the whole time as a writer, of   
   > course) but there was definitely that feel about it.   
   >   
   > That's not to say that Mike era episodes are bad. They're not, and   
   > when they're funny, they can be really funny. But Joel was certainly   
   > the better host.   
      
       I would figure that Joel is a slow awkward seducer in the bedroom with   
   lots of foreplay and snuggling afterward.   
       Mike would be full of passionate angry sex with a bit of jumbled   
   emotions and heavy sleeping afterward.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)