XPost: england.chat   
   From: johanne_uk@msn.com   
      
   "lucilu"  wrote in message   
   news:con9hg$1li$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk...   
   >   
   > "Jo"  wrote in message   
   > news:316suhF37v6iaU2@individual.net...   
   > >   
   > > "Elise"  wrote in message   
   > > news:602a0c1.0412011215.57900408@posting.google.com...   
   > >> I have enjoyed what i've seen of the current series so far.   
   > >> Natalie was the main interest in the first week or so; acting a   
   > >> completely idiotic wimp. The tension between her and the utterly   
   > >> vacuous Sophie was funny to watch too. And Sophie's feeble attempt at   
   > >> leadership was cringeworthy. I've also found Janet and Paul vaguely   
   > >> interesting at times. However most of the 'celebs' have not made much   
   > >> impact at all.   
   > >> I have happily sat through several episodes since it's been on; I feel   
   > >> they are well-edited and Ant and Dec are great as usual. (Actually,   
   > >> they might be the best bit...)   
   > >> The show is certainly not compelling enough to make me wanna switch   
   > >> over to the live unedited shows on cable.   
   > >   
   > > I agree about Ant and Dec, they make me laugh more than the celebs...   
   > >   
   > Me too. Wouldn't be half as good without them.   
   >   
   I agree....on the TV vote on This Morning, they put Paul Burrell in the   
   lead...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)