XPost: england.chat   
   From: johanne_uk@msn.com   
      
   "lucilu"  wrote in message   
   news:coq3s5$nqd$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...   
   >   
   > "Jo"  wrote in message   
   > news:31987aF38snbeU1@individual.net...   
   > >   
   > > "lucilu"  wrote in message   
   > > news:con9hg$1li$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk...   
   > >>   
   > >> "Jo"  wrote in message   
   > >> news:316suhF37v6iaU2@individual.net...   
   > >> >   
   > >> > "Elise"  wrote in message   
   > >> > news:602a0c1.0412011215.57900408@posting.google.com...   
   > >> >> I have enjoyed what i've seen of the current series so far.   
   > >> >> Natalie was the main interest in the first week or so; acting a   
   > >> >> completely idiotic wimp. The tension between her and the utterly   
   > >> >> vacuous Sophie was funny to watch too. And Sophie's feeble attempt   
   at   
   > >> >> leadership was cringeworthy. I've also found Janet and Paul vaguely   
   > >> >> interesting at times. However most of the 'celebs' have not made   
   much   
   > >> >> impact at all.   
   > >> >> I have happily sat through several episodes since it's been on; I   
   feel   
   > >> >> they are well-edited and Ant and Dec are great as usual. (Actually,   
   > >> >> they might be the best bit...)   
   > >> >> The show is certainly not compelling enough to make me wanna switch   
   > >> >> over to the live unedited shows on cable.   
   > >> >   
   > >> > I agree about Ant and Dec, they make me laugh more than the celebs...   
   > >> >   
   > >> Me too. Wouldn't be half as good without them.   
   > >>   
   > > I agree....on the TV vote on This Morning, they put Paul Burrell in the   
   > > lead...   
   > >   
   > I'd be happy with that, either him or Joe. How about you?   
   >   
   Yep, im the same, but would prefer Paul, but Joe is 2nd choice..   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)