XPost: england.chat   
   From: bazfranklin@hotmail.com   
      
   "lucilu"  wrote in message   
   news:coq3s5$nqd$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...   
   >   
   > "Jo"  wrote in message   
   > news:31987aF38snbeU1@individual.net...   
   >>   
   >> "lucilu"  wrote in message   
   >> news:con9hg$1li$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk...   
   >>>   
   >>> "Jo"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:316suhF37v6iaU2@individual.net...   
   >>> >   
   >>> > "Elise"  wrote in message   
   >>> > news:602a0c1.0412011215.57900408@posting.google.com...   
   >>> >> I have enjoyed what i've seen of the current series so far.   
   >>> >> Natalie was the main interest in the first week or so; acting a   
   >>> >> completely idiotic wimp. The tension between her and the utterly   
   >>> >> vacuous Sophie was funny to watch too. And Sophie's feeble attempt at   
   >>> >> leadership was cringeworthy. I've also found Janet and Paul vaguely   
   >>> >> interesting at times. However most of the 'celebs' have not made much   
   >>> >> impact at all.   
   >>> >> I have happily sat through several episodes since it's been on; I   
   >>> >> feel   
   >>> >> they are well-edited and Ant and Dec are great as usual. (Actually,   
   >>> >> they might be the best bit...)   
   >>> >> The show is certainly not compelling enough to make me wanna switch   
   >>> >> over to the live unedited shows on cable.   
   >>> >   
   >>> > I agree about Ant and Dec, they make me laugh more than the celebs...   
   >>> >   
   >>> Me too. Wouldn't be half as good without them.   
   >>>   
   >> I agree....on the TV vote on This Morning, they put Paul Burrell in the   
   >> lead...   
   >>   
   > I'd be happy with that, either him or Joe. How about you?   
      
   Is Paul Burrell OK then?  I imagined he'd be rather a whiney sort of  "I   
   survived inspite of them" type pain really!   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)