From: prino@onetel.com   
      
   "Jason Burgon" wrote in message   
   news:DaYad.910$hb7.644@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...   
   > "Robert AH Prins" wrote in message   
   > news:2t2io9F1r2oj7U1@uni-berlin.de...   
   >> To do the final benchmarks of my replacement libs for BP7, I tried   
   >> to use pure DOS (PC DOS 2000) with just HIMEM.SYS on my AMD64 (with   
   >> 1Gb of RAM).   
   >>   
   >> It rebooted consistently. Then I remembered somesing about using   
   >> DPMIMEM and tried it with values from as low as 2048 to close to   
   >> 64Mb. The problem persists...   
   >>   
   >> Does anyone have any clues what to do next? (FWIW, with EMM386   
   >> loaded I don't have any problems...)   
   >   
   > Try using the HIMEM.SYS supplied with Win98x .   
      
   I don't have W98, but you have my email address. ;)   
      
   > I've found it to be the most robust, though I've not tried the ME   
   > version (which is likely to be idendical).   
   >   
   > You should also junk (ok, rename them to Xxxx.701) the RTM.EXE and   
   > DPMIBI16.OVL files supplied with BP7 and use the one supplied with   
   > any of my (DPMI) downloads from the "downloads" page of my website   
   > (see my sig). The ONLY problem I've found with these replacements   
   > is that DPMIBI16.OVL requires at least XMS services to be provided   
   > by your environment (eg by HIMEM.SYS).   
      
   Great, it now works, without any DPMIMEM switches!   
      
   > Don't load EMM386 if you want best performance, or the best   
   > reliability for that matter.   
      
   It's never caused me any problems on my old PC...   
      
   FWIW, where did you get those DPMIBI16.OVL & RTM.EXE files? And, not   
   that _I_ care much, what's their legal status, as it would be useful   
   to include them in BLP70V20.ZIP (Yes, it's finally coming to Garbo   
   RSN...)   
      
   Robert   
   --   
   Robert AH Prins   
   prino at onetel dot com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|