From: prino@onetel.com   
      
   "L D Blake"  wrote in message   
   news:fue5n053thu02e43s3emmmorkst6va4oa2@4ax.com...   
   > On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:42:13 +0200, Markus Humm   
   >    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>Hm, for people already owning a copy of the RTL it might be legal.   
   >>Or am I wrong?   
   >   
   > Ownership does not imply the right to re-distribute.  To sell even a   
   > patched copy without permission could land one in a ton of legal   
   > trouble.   
      
   Re-distributing altered binary copies of the RTL is legal, look at   
   TPL60N19.ZIP, BPL70N16.ZIP and Pedt Scragg's and my own non-RTE200 CRT   
   units on Garbo.   
      
   > That said... there would be nothing preventing the OP from selling a   
   > bit of software to insert the patch or a set of instructions on how   
   > to patch the RTL. (In fact I'll be putting a couple of pages on my   
   > website about this  very thing in the next couple of days.)   
      
   Looking forward to it!   
      
   FWIW, on Friday I finally at long last uploaded BPL70V20.ZIP to Garbo.   
   It's a partial 32-bit version of Norbert Juffa's BPL70N16.ZIP. I don't   
   know if and when Timo will put it in the proper directory (turbopa7).   
      
   Robert   
   --   
   Robert AH Prins   
   prino at onetel dot com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)