Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.pascal.borland    |    Borland Pascal was actually pretty neat    |    2,978 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,139 of 2,978    |
|    Ulrich Diez to All    |
|    Installing Borland Pascal on a laterward    |
|    26 Nov 04 12:07:40    |
      From: Ulrich.Diez@Student.Uni-Tuebingen.De              Hello!              I'm about to create a bootable-cd with a small Win95/DOS 7.0-Kernel.       While booting, a hard-disk C: is emulated from the cd.       I also will have a RAM-disk available, but it's driveletter is not a fixed       value but depends on the acurrent architecture of the machine (I often       replace, add or remove some drives).       In order to resolve this, I have two environment-variables %RAMDRV%       and %BOOTDRV% available, which denote to the current letters of the       emulated hard-drive and the RAM-disk.              On this CD I would like to have Borland-Pascal 7.0 available also.              Some questions arose:              a) technical-aspects              As there are settings and stuff in the IDE where write-access is needed,       I thought I could have BP copied into RAM-disk and started from there.       But I assume that there are some files in BP, which denote to absolute       file paths where drive-letters occur.       As the drive-letter of the RAM-drive is not fixed, I should have created       these files on-the-fly according to the above-mentioned environment-       variables during the copy-to-RAM-disk process.              Which files of the BP 7.0-distribution actually need write-access?       Which files of the BP 7.0-distribution denote to absolute file-paths with       drive-letters ?       Is it possible -e.g. via some configuration-script- to only move these files       into RAM-disk while leaving everything else on the write-protected disk?              b) legal/license-aspects              [I don't want to start a flame-war here but somehow I'm interested: ]       I bought Borland Pascal 7.0 legally some years ago. But I don't know any       more about the license-type. Under what circumstances is it at all legal       to have it installed on such a bootable-CD? For example the CD could       (not simultaneously but in sequence) be used on different PCs/CPUs       although the install-procedure took place at only one PC from which the       CD was created.              Sincerely              Ulrich              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca