From: assemblywizard@gmail.com
I mean, unless you have another command line OS, you cant run it in
windows--so you are stuck with using it in dos... now besides like child
going around thinking no one knows syntax and you are "special" and
"intelligent" for knowing, you are going to start giving us classes in
bios and dos ints... geesh, where do you come from a society of ignorant
people--even the homeless people carry laptops and program where I
live...
I also mean you are wasting everyone's time with this argument
dribble--but I just repeat myself to someone unwilling or unable to
comprehend... your teachers are stuck with reciting time and time again
until it gets though you skill--I am not... find a child to argue
with...
John
"F Verbeek" wrote in message
news:11a4403lb7b0a4d@corp.supernews.com...
> In the obscure news:2FZne.23$oL3.500882@news.sisna.com,
> Someone calling himself John Smith
> suspiciously hiding as uttered:
>
>
> Please stop the top posting
>
>
>> That isn't pascal, it is dos, that is why it is in the dos unit,
>> duh!!! You can run dos on a mainframe... (well, you could, most
>> programmers would be too intelligent to translate it to run there...)
>>
>
> You just claimed it to be assembler.
> Now you are claiming it to be dos.
>
> DOS simply means Disk Operating System.
> Again, you can call Dos functions in almost any language.
>
> The Dos unit is simply a Pascal library to the most common Disk
> Operating
> System functions, most of them dealing with file handling.
>
> If you meant MS-DOS, that would be a call to the MSDOS procedure or
> intr($21, ..), this is also located in the Dos unit.
>
>
> --
> Femme Verbeek
>
>
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
