From: mike@blackcat.demon.co.uk   
      
   In article  marcov@stack.nl wrote...   
      
   > To my knowledge, plagiarism is not theft at all. E.g. something can be in the   
   > public domain, and you can still plagiate it.   
   >   
   > Please don't fall for the silly one liners of the Hollywood mob. If   
   > something has different definitions in law texts, it is for good reasons,   
   > and equating everything with either theft or (mass)murder is ridiculous.   
      
   Okay, so how about calling it 'intellectually dishonest' instead?   
      
   Mike Dickson, Edinburgh, Scotland   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)