Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware    |    Discussing IBM PS/2 hardware    |    42,985 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 41,075 of 42,985    |
|    Tomas Slavotinek to Louis Ohland    |
|    Re: IML - Implementation Differences    |
|    28 Dec 22 23:28:56    |
      From: slavotinek@gmail.com              On 28.12.2022 23:09, Louis Ohland wrote:       > Does the T0 do a planar ID check? If not, does that mean installing in a       > Model 95 is not easy?       >       > Tomas Slavotinek wrote:       >> If it detects the Model 90 planar, it installs the embedded ESDI BIOS       >> extensions and uses the Int 13h routines to check for an IML record on       >> the first DBA ESDI drive. [Yes, it should be possible to IML from a       >> DBA ESDI drive on an early Model 90 with one of the "non-enhanced" T1       >> BIOS ROMs. The same is true for the T0 complex, where the ESDI install       >> happens unconditionally - no planar ID check is needed since it was       >> only available with Model 90.              The T0 doesn't check the planar ID before calling the ESDI init. But       this shouldn't cause any trouble. It's just... unnecessary step.              There is a planar ID check in the T0 "minus" IML code, but it relates to       the ROM-resident Stage 2 POST that is exclusive to the 256K T0- ROM.       (but that code path seems to be bugged anyway...)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca