Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware    |    Discussing IBM PS/2 hardware    |    42,985 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 41,311 of 42,985    |
|    Louis Ohland to Ryan Alswede    |
|    Devil's in the details    |
|    31 Jan 23 05:47:27    |
      From: ohland@charter.net              Shows what happens with cutting back on coffee. What follows is my       Non-Programmer's view of what would be good for development and testing.       YMWD [Your Mileage WILL differ]              Let's go back to the initial question: a 486 for NT kernel driver debug.              Add in a desire for a desktop.              I must admit having my consciousness warped by your struggles with the       7-6 and conflated that with needing to be able to bring up an RS/6000       adapter in this desktop.              Is the "NT kernel driver" for the NT system, or is it for an adapter?              My desire from the start has been to identify a system that is "stock       IBM", by that, we know where the ROMs will be loaded and what I/O       addresses will be used.              To make that unholy desire understandable, MAJ Tom has painfully probed       some systems, and noticed that the POST code does a "rough POST" that       goes right for the sweet spot - it looks at memory locations and I/O       that are used by IBM manufactured adapters and devices. This even edges       out POSID, a fact that was utterly alien to me.              So, if starting out with a bunch of unknowns, I would shy away from       non-IBM kit for developing the early versions. Bermuda, stock IBM.       Lacuna, S3 928 video [ever set up video under 9x and noticed the extra       I/O addresses? ] and IDE [what O/S expect to find IDE on MCA ?].              Further, later adapters and system devices use an 8K NVRAM. Think of       systems that can use a Corvette. Those systems have 8K. So no 70s or 80s.              9577 is relatively spacious. A 90, not so at all.              9577 Bermuda, max 32MB FPM, 90 can do 64MB [8x8MB] or up to 256MB if you       can findt the uncommon 32MB ECC SIMMs.              9577 Bermuda can swap out video, XGA, XGA-2, Short 1MB... 90, on-board       XGA, not the cleanest co-existence with other video. IMHO, much better       co-existence than with the S3 928, but... If you can fix the issue NT       has with vga256.dll and enable 800x600x64k on NT, then you have done well.              What would I think would be a REAL stock IBM system? A Model 95 with the       single serial / single parallel planar. No surprises there. Mix n match       video and SCSI, allows you to build the initial version, then swap up to       test the next version.              486 complex? Hmm. To test IML capability, a 486DX50 upgrade, with the       enhanced complex BIOS. Lorenzo might have some left. Keeping within the       Type 1, a 486DX2-66 upgrade [Flash], followed by a non-SOD K [IML], both       complexi with a DX4 / Turbochip.              In addition, the 95 has the slots cut into the case for RS/6000 sized       adapters, think of the Passplay. You can easily run 64MB of FPM with       8x8MB SIMMs.              I gave my last 8595 to Kevin a few years ago. Can't help you with one.                            Ryan Alswede wrote:       > Looking for a PS/2 workstation that has a 486 so it can run NT for kernel       driver debug.       >       > What models should I be looking for? If anybody has one in their basement       I don't mind paying shipping.       >       > Thanks.       >              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca