Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware    |    Discussing IBM PS/2 hardware    |    42,985 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 41,635 of 42,985    |
|    Tomas Slavotinek to schimmi    |
|    Re: Did you READ it? Re: IBM Single Chip    |
|    19 Apr 23 21:40:25    |
      From: slavotinek@gmail.com              On 19.04.2023 20:47, schimmi wrote:       > Hm, I thought, the Local Bus on a PS/2 _is_ MCA, like VLB or PCI on other       machines. Do I miss something here? :)              Well, local bus is a rather ambiguous term. Generally it has two       (sometimes overlapping) meanings:              -a bus that is a direct or almost direct extension of the CPU bus (no       bridges, only buffers... if that)       -a high-performance bus that overcomes the bandwidth limitations of the       legacy bus (this meaning is somewhat relative as "legacy" may mean ISA       or even MCA or EISA)              Some period-correct publications called MCA "a local bus" but this was       mainly to highlight its higher performance (granted, the early MCA       implementations where somewhat closer to the CPU bus...).              Even PCI is sometimes called a local bus (the term is used even in the       PCI standard itself), yet it clearly is not local to the CPU, it's       always bridged.              To remove this ambiguity we use the "local bus" term only for components       that are attached directly to the CPU bus (possibly through some       buffers) - like the S3 video on Lacuna, the SCSI subsystem on the 56/57        planars, the GXT150L GPU in the RS/6000 7006, etc.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca