Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware    |    Discussing IBM PS/2 hardware    |    42,985 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 41,909 of 42,985    |
|    William Murray to All    |
|    Re: NMI Errors on Reply 8580 - SIMM comp    |
|    05 Jul 23 19:17:44    |
      From: willmurray461@gmail.com              I just did some preliminary testing, and I also got 41 via speedsys for the       8580 TurboProcessor with Pentium Overdrive. My Eduquest 55 with the same       Pentium Overdrive scores 61.              Other benchmarks show unexpectedly low performance as well, which is weird       since most artificial CPU benchmarks are not sensitive to other stuff on the       motherboard. For example, in Norton Sysinfo 8, my 8580 TurboProcessor only       scores 100. HOWEVER, my IBM        XT with Cyrix 5x86-120 scores ~250! It's a very strange hacked together system       that uses an Intel Inboard 386 and a Transcomputer 386-486 adapter, so it has       mediocre RAM speeds with a cripplingly slow 4.77MHz bus, so obviously the test       only cares about        the CPU; I have no idea why the TurboProcessor should score so low. The       POD-equipped Eduquest with Sysinfo scores ~260. I can't run speedsys though on       my XT, so IDK what it would be like.              I am using the 1.31 BIOS. As far as I can tell, 1.31 works with the Pentium       just fine. It identifies the processor as P24T, but erroneously marks it as       66MHz (chkcpu identifies it as operating at the intended 83MHz though).              Also, the Eduquest does WB L1 cache instead of WT like the 8580, so that could       at least partially explain things. Also, I don't know if L2 Cache is used for       speedsys, but I have 256KB in the Eduquest and 0KB in the 8580.              I wonder if it could have to do with some Pentium-specific registers not being       set? It almost feels like the cache is not being used, or some enhancement has       not been properly activated. I also might want to try out a Cyrix 5x86-133 and       see how it goes,        since messing with the performance-enhancing registers on those CPUs is easy,       though I need to get a heatsink for that first.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca