Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware    |    Discussing IBM PS/2 hardware    |    42,985 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 41,911 of 42,985    |
|    lharris428@gmail.com to William Murray    |
|    Re: NMI Errors on Reply 8580 - SIMM comp    |
|    05 Jul 23 23:18:48    |
      From: lharr...@gmail.com              On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 10:17:46 PM UTC-4, William Murray wrote:       > I just did some preliminary testing, and I also got 41 via speedsys for the       8580 TurboProcessor with Pentium Overdrive. My Eduquest 55 with the same       Pentium Overdrive scores 61.        >        > Other benchmarks show unexpectedly low performance as well, which is weird       since most artificial CPU benchmarks are not sensitive to other stuff on the       motherboard. For example, in Norton Sysinfo 8, my 8580 TurboProcessor only       scores 100. HOWEVER, my        IBM XT with Cyrix 5x86-120 scores ~250! It's a very strange hacked together       system that uses an Intel Inboard 386 and a Transcomputer 386-486 adapter, so       it has mediocre RAM speeds with a cripplingly slow 4.77MHz bus, so obviously       the test only cares        about the CPU; I have no idea why the TurboProcessor should score so low. The       POD-equipped Eduquest with Sysinfo scores ~260. I can't run speedsys though on       my XT, so IDK what it would be like.        >        > I am using the 1.31 BIOS. As far as I can tell, 1.31 works with the Pentium       just fine. It identifies the processor as P24T, but erroneously marks it as       66MHz (chkcpu identifies it as operating at the intended 83MHz though).        >        > Also, the Eduquest does WB L1 cache instead of WT like the 8580, so that       could at least partially explain things. Also, I don't know if L2 Cache is       used for speedsys, but I have 256KB in the Eduquest and 0KB in the 8580.        >        > I wonder if it could have to do with some Pentium-specific registers not       being set? It almost feels like the cache is not being used, or some       enhancement has not been properly activated. I also might want to try out a       Cyrix 5x86-133 and see how it goes,        since messing with the performance-enhancing registers on those CPUs is easy,       though I need to get a heatsink for that first.              It's odd isn't it? Your results are identical and I found the L2 cache didn't       do much, but I found it didn't do much for CPU tests on the Valuepoint       either. I figure that the boost from the cache will be application or game       specific. I will say this,        the Kingston TurboChip and the 100Mhz 486 Overdrive also score much less than       in other systems so I didn't feel that it was Pentium Specific. There is a       jumper on the bottom left of the board, J14, that is undocumented and I've       even tried flipping        that jumper with no help either. I've never been able to tell what it does.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca