Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware    |    Discussing IBM PS/2 hardware    |    42,985 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 42,032 of 42,985    |
|    RickE to gfre...@aol.com    |
|    Re: Cleaning gold contacts    |
|    08 Aug 23 16:45:59    |
      From: ekblaw@vnet.ibm.com              On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 11:23:57 PM UTC-4, gfre...@aol.com wrote:              > Yeah after 25 years,, they took the "gold can" away from us. The old        > guys said it was safer than carbon tetrachloride that they used before        > ;)               I used "carbon tet" for many things back in the 1960s, it was a great       cleaner. But as a demonstration of how dangerous it could be in closed       spaces, I used to kill butterflies for my collection using an old peanut       butter jar (yes, they used to be made        out of glass with metal lids). Put a few drops on a tissue, put the tissue in       the jar then add a thin cardboard circle to cover the tissue, put in the       butterfly and screw down the lid. Within 10 seconds the butterfly would be       dead, and it died so        quickly that it didn't have a chance to injure itself. The "typical"       butterfly killing chemical, nail polish remover, took much longer to work, the       butterflies would beat themselves inside the jar and far too often you wound       up with a specimen that wasn'       t worthy of mounting to the butterfly board. Triclor was indeed safer (and       less effective as a cleaner), though it certainly needed to be used with       care. Isopropyl alcohol is even safer, way less effective as a cleaner, but       has not yet fallen        completely afoul with the safety police.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca