From: ohland@charter.net   
      
   The Lacuna has a BIU, not a SSC.   
      
   Yeah, the Reply may have an actual SSC, but how much did IBM "tweak"   
   it?Sordid reminds me of the T/R chipsets that IBM fabbed for third party   
   manufacturers.   
      
   How about a little M or Type 4 hot n heavy action?   
      
   Christian Holzapfel wrote:   
   > Model 9576i (Lacuna)   
   > AMD X5 @ 133 MHz   
   > 64 MB RAM   
   > No L2 cache:-(   
   > Windows 95   
   > Burst Mode Rx+Tx   
   > Netio 1.32   
   >   
   > Packet size  1k bytes:  1193.33 KByte/s Tx,  936.21 KByte/s Rx.   
   > Packet size  2k bytes:  1290.28 KByte/s Tx,  1114.61 KByte/s Rx.   
   > Packet size  4k bytes:  1389.92 KByte/s Tx,  1575.54 KByte/s Rx.   
   > Packet size  8k bytes:  1741.82 KByte/s Tx,  1541.64 KByte/s Rx.   
   > Packet size 16k bytes:  1969.17 KByte/s Tx,  1173.42 KByte/s Rx.   
   > Packet size 32k bytes:  1934.02 KByte/s Tx,  1874.79 KByte/s Rx.   
      
   > That the Lacuna and Reply perform so low is disappointing, but maybe there's   
   a reason why IBM did not sell this adapter to PS/2 users - or maybe we will   
   find a magic switch to make the card operate faster.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)