Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware    |    Discussing IBM PS/2 hardware    |    42,985 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 42,298 of 42,985    |
|    Louis Ohland to Kevin Bowling    |
|    BIU ?    |
|    01 Dec 23 18:59:28    |
      From: ohland@charter.net              https://www.ardent-tool.com/tech/ASIC_Info.html#71G0438              The Lacuna and Reply use BIUs, The Reply 60/80 also actually has an SSC.              _MAYBE_ the inclusion of a BIU turbo-diddles the performance of the 9-K?              A weg to investigate this angle would be to use a Type 3 ["M"] or a Type       4 ["N"] complex, both of which do not have a BIU.              Kevin Bowling wrote:       >       >> That the Lacuna and Reply perform so low is disappointing, but maybe       >> there's a reason why IBM did not sell this adapter to PS/2 users - or       >> maybe we will find a magic switch to make the card operate faster.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca