From: rebewmot@nexgo.de   
      
   >>This your ever-final text   
   >is called signature   
   Yes, be it a sig., but anyway it's thy ever-final text.   
      
   >you may want to learn   
   I very mostly want to learn......   
      
   >some net etiquettes   
   'netiquettes'?   
      
   >while you at it.   
   --> while you are at it. !!   
      
   >>to be your filosofical heritage, so to speak.   
   >you're trolling   
   I don't know "trolling" means.   
      
   >grind that axe of yours sharp...   
   This thy terminology is despicable: It shows (proves?) that thou art   
   violence-oriented!.....   
      
   > no just me, after filling my room with worthless gas i tend to reach the   
   > helm of my mantra climax and words just flow away in a world seems to be   
   > less round everyday *earth*, but why you give the crap anyway? is a   
   > signature.   
   All in all: This thy text isn't understandable to me. Who is unable?!?   
   Thou or i?!? Hmmm?.....   
   >the helm of my mantra climax [?!!?]   
   >words just flow away in a world seems to be less round everyday *earth*   
   --> world "that seems" or "seeming"!!!   
      
   Werest thou on cannabis when texting the above quoted?   
   This appears to be a much relevant question.....   
      
   The core, yea nuke of my text was:   
      
   Thy huge fault was:  n o t  to respond to my questions repeated   
   below!!!!!!!   
   > > {--> People with similar circumstances tend to  !!}   
   > > But can we  i n d e e d  find like-minded beings "across space" (!) and   
   > > "no matter distance" {--> n. m. of d.}, e.g. on planets in our   
   > > galaxy---or even in a neighbouring one??!!?? Hmmm??..... I'm caught in   
   > > extreme doubt.....}   
      
   Thou hast written, i might learn, and as well thou shouldst be willing   
   to!!   
   Thou hast to comprehend what the  C O R E  of a message is PLUS to   
   afterwards respond to it!!!   
   Learn this and do not dodge this important hint!!!   
      
      
   > you have left the most important bit out "giving enough time in life"   
   --> given enough time .. ?!?  This bit thou hast not included in thy   
   then message! Therefore it's too late now to introduce it as an   
   argument!   
   > time = space <-- is basic physics   
   "basic physics"?? No, such is not taught in schools, neither in   
   high-schools etc.....   
   Such stuff (time=space) is basically incomprehensible!!! ---> Why can we   
   move within space (limited), but  N O T  within time??!!!?? Haaaa???   
   Answer he to this my 'drilling' question thoroughly!!!   
      
   Thy huge fault was/is: Thou wantest  n o t  to respond to the aspects   
   which i had layed out in my initial message!!!....... This is very   
   'ungood'!, as it were.   
      
   >> Do Not [....] Use without my Permission   
   >No, i won't!, namely because of my above-submitted question.   
   >no one stepped on your tail ....   
   That's true because my tail forever had been  m u c h  too short. That   
   much honesty gotta be.   
      
   >>One should always rethink one's thought-patterns.   
   >and the point is ?   
   That thou shouldest massively begin rethinking (plus later discarding)   
   this thy pattern:   
   "People alike with a similar circumstances, tend to find each others   
   across space [.....] no matter distance"   
   The space, the volume of the universe is thus gigantic that NO living   
   being could EVER (!!!) be able to reach out just a bit into   
   it---whatever the purpose may be......   
   T h e r e f o r e  like-minded beings will  N E V E R  be able to find   
   one another "across space" and "no matter distance"!!!!!!!!!!!   
   Is this explained clearly enough???   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)