XPost: alt.startrek, alt.tv.star-trek, alt.tv.star-trek.enterprise   
   From: shardar@NOSPAMbtinternet.com   
      
   Mighty Krell wrote:   
   > "Benjamin Pavsner" wrote in message   
   > news:6otMd.7275$3W3.5135@bignews4.bellsouth.net...   
   >   
   >>The only thing that kind of surprised me about Enterprise is the fact it   
   >   
   > was   
   >   
   >>produced at all. Trekkers (with exception to the real hard core fans) felt   
   >>Voyager was not up to standard.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > Far too few people actually said this to Paramount.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
      
   Well I did wonder why my local network hadn't picked up enterprise after   
   season 2. As for nemesis, it wasn't a bad movie at all. Interesting in a   
   spot the parrallels to wrath of kahn sort of way.   
      
   Problem with enterprise I think is that it was set in the federations   
   past at all! If it was set just after generations when Kirk is   
   apparently killed by the nexus, and then follow Sulu and crew on the   
   excelsior, then you may well have got yourself a hit series. Possibly   
   have Sulu et al pushed forward in time to the 29th century? Well ideas   
   and stuff, doesn't matter now. Maybe in a few years they'll have learned   
   from the mistake that is enterprise, come and read these newsgroups, and   
   figure something better.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|