Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.startrek    |    More Star Trek weirdo fan worship    |    3,801 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,577 of 3,801    |
|    =/\= STAR TREK RPG =/\= to All    |
|    Re: [NEWS] - UPN Reviving Trek Name?    |
|    09 Aug 03 13:09:11    |
      XPost: alt.startrek, alt.tv.star-trek, alt.tv.star-trek.enterprise       From: rpg@SPAMrcn.com              Well, as always what I'm saying is opinion and some speculation I suppose       but here goes:              Enterprise was a pre-quel. It was designed to be "before" Star Trek and the       way I understand it is that taking the "Star Trek" out of it wasn't meant to       be insulting as everyone associates Enterprise (just the name alone makes       one think of Star Trek). It was designed to give the impression of being       "before" Star Trek.              The idea of the different intro was for the same purpose. I personally like       the new intro and the "message" that is in the intro. Certainly, they could       have done the same intro with a more Star Trek themed music.              I like the new show. I think it was added to the Trek family too quickly       after the ending of the 24th century series shows. The fans had gotten used       to the fancy big ships and gadgets. Now they have to get used to no       transporters and bulky phase guns.              To me, the idea of forging through space with out all of the fancy gadgets       is much more exciting. I like to watch as the series unfolds and the       characters are forced to use their brains vs. their brawn.              I also feel the actors have done a wonderful job. Now this is going to be a       stretch but I hope people don't treat the actors like they treated the       returning Vietnam vets. Just because we don't support the "war" doesn't       mean we can't recognize the true talents and entertainment of those       conducting the show and fighting the battles.              I feel this is probably the best cast of Star Trek in the history of the       franchise. They have so much less to work with and a preconception to win       over. When the Original Series was produced, this was virgin territory.       This cast has to go back and try to pretend to be "before" TOS and create       the history of Trek after its already been written. That is never an easy       thing to do. It works much better in Star Wars because the entire concept       was written out that way. The history in the prequel didn't change. In       Star Trek, there was never intended to be a prequel series. So, now       everyone has to dance around the inconsistencies of TOS and then TNG era       series - which I might add, always HAD inconsistencies among themselves.              Poor poor actors! They have their job cut out for them. Writers too!              Being Trek franchise fans means supporting the concept of the show,       regardless of some of the bumps in the road. We shouldn't become shot gun       passengers who bail out when the road becomes unpaved.              I'll support Trek in whatever format they serve it. I didn't specifically       like the TNG era series but I watched it. I always felt it was riddled with       errors and unrealistic situations. But, in the end, it is a fantasy show       meant to entertain. :)              Thanks. Thoughts? Comments? Bashings? :)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca