XPost: alt.startrek, alt.tv.star-trek, alt.tv.star-trek.enterprise   
   From: laura@lauragoodwin.org   
      
   Bo Raxo wrote:   
   >   
   > "ToolPackinMama"  wrote in message   
   > news:3F330F70.80C5A7DF@lauragoodwin.org...   
   > > wandering wastrel wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > In article <1d85jvg29kqmkpl7fv73viu1tf1n3jjm2i@4ax.com>,   
   > > > spam@wonderful.Spam says...   
   > > > > UPN Reviving Trek Name?   
   > > >   
   > > > Now if only they'd consider reviving the **quality** of the show so it   
   > > > would get somewhere closer to the standards of Trek we might really have   
   > > > something worth watching, no?   
   > >   
   > > Maybe.  What "quality" are you speaking of?   
   > >   
   > > IMHO, the quality that made the original Star Trek great is the   
   > > willingness to express/extol leftist virtues, and pro-diversity   
   > > virtues.  I have NO IDEA if that is the kind of Trek you miss, or   
   > > WHAT... but it is the kind of Trek that *I* miss.   
   >   
   > Yes.  Exactly. What she said.   
      
   {HUG!}   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)